I honestly have no idea why people like Wonder Woman that much. Even Doug Walker (the Nostalgia Critic) and his brother, who've take a huge dumps on better movies, are saying this is the first good DC movie. Is that really what everyone really wanted, mediocrity? It's so safe it's forgettable and yet everyone is going ape***t over it. I won't argue the quality of the other movies by contrast because that is a whole thesis length publication. Anyway, this is not as good a movie as everyone is making it out to be, it's cliche, forgettable, and tries to do nothing new, and yet every person and critic whose opinion I trust online, whom I've usually share somewhat similar tastes with is going on about how the movie is the only good DCCU to date.
Is it because they have jokes? If that's the case then I'm disappointed because if the one thing that would change their opinions on the difference between a good and bad superhero movie is just that, if someone made a movie and everyone says it's bad but then added jokes and suddenly it was good (or it doesn't take itself seriously, however you want to phrase it) then it tells me that those people are just overgrown infants who get bored easily and I know that's not true.
The reason I'm so up in arms on this is because of something that Doug Walker's brother, Rob, said about Man of Steel. When he talked about the scene where papa Kent told Clark 'maybe' he referred to Jonathan as 'psycho Kent' for saying that, which I thought was the most shallow way to perceive that, with so little attempt to understand what happened, almost like he was angry and didn't want to look at it any further than at quick glance and I thought better of that guy, yet he finds something so mediocre great praise it at as good. I find myself wondering if people really do just want more of the same, if for all their talk of change, originality, and trying to tell better stories they only really want to have their fanaticism bonner stroked.