So the ex Minister for Economical Progress had something to say about videogames.
"The problem is passivity when compared to reading and playing. You react, you don't act. Furthermore, they get the mind used to a speed which makes any other activity slow and boring."
I'm noticing blatant mistakes and ignorance about the subject there. Like ok, I do agree with the last sentence. It is true that videogames offer instant gratification, which generally makes people vastly prefer them to "slower" activities such as reading. It's also why people can get addicted to videogames.
But everything before that, I find questionable. For starters, you deem videogames as passive hobbies while reading and "traditional" playing as active ones. I can agree on the latter but reading? That's notoriously a passive activity, my dude. Videogames are not at all a passive medium, and you very much act as well as react while playing them. Unless you're playing a Telltale game or something like that, which is pretty much comparable to another passive activity such as watching a movie, videogames inevitably challenge you one way or the other.
It's pretty evident to me the guy never really bothered to get to know the medium, and is thus merely talking from a biased, willfully ignorant point of view. I didn't even need him saying, and I quote, "I won't let them [videogames] in my house" to realize this.