Wasn't it because they received mighty f***loads of anti-net neutrality spams from bots?
Supposedly 40% of the "public opinion" they got were duplicate posts against net-neutrality and these were the ones being rejected.
My understanding is that it was emails in support of keeping net neutrality? But, in the panic, I think a lot of things have gotten mixed up. If it
was because of a bunch of people saying to get rid of it, then...I don't know what to tell you. If it was in support of
keeping it, then it's probably because people have been using form emails (because of social anxiety, not knowing how to write to officials, not knowing where to contact, etc.) and they can easily sweep that aside as "spam". Perhaps there
were legitimate bots, but, to my understanding, when it comes to them shooting down claims of support for keeping net neutrality, it's mainly been excuses. Pai has also gone on to say that they won't be considering
any feedback that isn't in legal terms, meaning that, unless you're a lawyer who specializes in this field, the average person's opinion does not count. Either way, the thought of having to pay an additional $40 - $100 a month just to post my writing and go onto the three other sites I visit really is ticking me off.