LOL, this is ridiculous. As soon as someone mentions that there were more threads whining about the people who disliked DmC than there were threads hating on DmC, you get an offended response by someone who prefers DmC.
It plays out like a joke.
Meg said:
''They keep popping up*, and they're so pointless.''
*threads complaining about people who didn't like DmC, and about how DMC3/4 Dante is sh*t and DmC did it all much better... etc etc.
Response:
''Hang in there and maybe one day, people will stop talking about all the hate they received just because they chose the wrong game to like.'' (DmC)
Sarcasm again. Just because you're acting like you're traumatized by all the past hate towards DmC, that doesn't mean you have the right to insult people, be a passive-aggressive nag, and keep bringing up how offended you are.
Some don't like DmC. Like Meg said, get over it. Why even respond? You're just proving her point! DmC didn't sell very well. Know why that is? Because most people didn't like it much. I'm sure you're just going to fully attribute it to the part of the fanbase that hated on DmC, though. -__-
Stuck in the past much? No need to act like you 'deserve your DmC2'. We got DmC, but other than that, we deserve nothing. Devs make games based on what they think gamers like, and if they don't get the revenue they wanted, they'll change it all up. If DmC is received mildly by gamers, it's not their fault DmC failed. You can't fault them for having opinions different to yours.
If this goes on, I'm reporting it. This is supposed to be a decent forum, where we accept that opinions are not facts, but we also accept they hold a lot of power. We should accept that most opinions can't be changed, just like you can't say I'm wrong for liking the color blue. Yours is no more important than anyone else's. We shouldn't defend obnoxious behavior just because of free speech, or because people want to vent by bashing others into the ground.