"Attacked" every night? What imagery does her description bring to mind exactly? And abuse, sexual of otherwise, has to be handled well in order to bring actual depth to a character's back story. She just up and exposits about it in deadpan, and it's supposed to add this emotional investment to her. It just feels hollow, without real perspective on the nature of abuse or the intense emotions that come with it.
Which is why it comes off that she was just beaten and not raped or such like some people claim. I know people who have been through that, and when I asked them what they thought of that scene, they said "yeah, they just bullied and beat her, she wasn't raped if that's how she talked about it."
Plus: Vergil should have given here a gat to keep the cops at bay. Like everyone else in the Order. But then we couldn't have the heavy handed "Cops r teh evulzs" scenes.
I wouldn't call it sexist though. I would call it realistic. Women are flawed, like men are.
Vergil should have given her a gat to keep the cops at bay. Like everyone else in the Order. But then we couldn't have the heavy handed "Cops r teh evulzs" scenes.
Lilith says during the fight the kid is immortal just like his father.
I don't know what this means though.
...he didn't give anyone in the Order any way to defend themselves, they were all essentially bean counters. Vergil gives the impression he trusted NO ONE else with a weapon
Which is why it comes off that she was just beaten and not raped or such like some people claim. I know people who have been through that, and when I asked them what they thought of that scene, they said "yeah, they just bullied and beat her, she wasn't raped if that's how she talked about it."
I was under the impression that only Nephilim were capable of actually traveling between Limbo and the real world, which is why they were hunted after all. Kat's spirit could travel to Limbo, but that's not the same, her body was still in the real world. So I don't see how Vergil could have given anyone a gate, when only he and Dante can use it to cross worlds?
welp this convo has turned again Feminism now oh boy let me stay out of this
^Pretty much this.I gatta say... I'm surprised to know that people are going apes#!t over this whole dead baby thing. I mean killing babies..? No cool, that much is true. However in this case it seems the none existent baby that got blown away, who by the way was the devil's spawn, is getting some odd amount of sympathy. I say this because, and to the point, A) it seems that people forget that on the previous level you spend a boss fight shooting, punching, slicing, dicing, and generally attempting to ensure some violence on to a mother and child and while some would argue that the end result of that conflict did not result in death I say violence is violence and if one is not right the other should not be ether. B) I honestly think that if Vergil had executed baby while he was out of the mother looking as disgusting as he did this wouldn't be an issue. Hell, I'd bet money on it.
More than that if the mission wasn't to capture but to kill in the game there would be no gripes about it ether. Why? I think it's because
I get it though. There are morality scenarios in ethic classes and books that ask you if you'd kill a child to save the world of cure diseases and the PC thing to say is no but the reality is that mobs would gather to tear the child apart no question. If this scenario were real and people knew that that woman was a demon and her child was satan spawn not only would there be no objections they would bring chips and salsa.
I'm just saying that it's an odd double standard that it's cool to insert violence, and I mean violence, on to a demon baby and mommy but it's uncalled for to kill 'em. I say ether both or nether, no middle ground where the idea of killing that ugly evil thing is a no no but it's OK to shot and hack at it's eye ball.
... Wow... This was a way longer post than I intended or that was necessary.
^Pretty much this.
If it eases anyone's moral values, Lilith was only concerned about her own value and high position beside Mundus. If the spawn had meant nothing to Mundus, she would have probably killed it herself. Plus, this is a game about demons. Focus on objecting to the real thing rather than crying murder about a game.
+ I'm glad Vergil pulled the trigger.
He made Dante say 'what the ****' with a funny expression. It made me giggle. LOL achieved, moving on.
You see, this is why it's common etiquette to scan over a thread and see what points other people have made before you post.
Hyperbole: The Spawn was just as sentient as Dante and Vergil, and Sparda proves that Demons are not inherently evil in this setting. Therefore killing a demon baby is just as immoral as killing a human baby, and judging it just because it appears monstrous is missing the point entirely.
And while we might agree that it may have been a necessary measure to goad Mundas, the game's treatment of the event is poor.
I did, actually, and it hasn't changed my mind on the subject. I agree with the OP's post and that's it. A demon baby is NOT a human baby, that's the key here. It's a demon, kill it.You see, this is why it's common etiquette to scan over a thread and see what points other people have made before you post.
Hyperbole: The Spawn was just as sentient as Dante and Vergil, and Sparda proves that Demons are not inherently evil in this setting. Therefore killing a demon baby is just as immoral as killing a human baby, and judging it just because it appears monstrous is missing the point entirely.
And while we might agree that it may have been a necessary measure to goad Mundas, the game's treatment of the event is poor.
Tried that for awhile... Couldn't resist the temptation.Naw ill just stay over here and watch the forum from afar
So you wanted lilith not to die so she could take care of the kid
I did, actually, and it hasn't changed my mind on the subject. I agree with the OP's post and that's it. A demon baby is NOT a human baby, that's the key here. It's a demon, kill it.
...Demon Baby still equals "BABY", and as proven by Sparda AND Phineas, Demon's are not by default going to be evil, that's just how they get conditioned to be. Look carefully at Vergil's face right after he fires, he's horrified with what he just did and the implications of what it means. They did miss a huge character development hook, and I am a bit disgusted with how they wrote Dante as just railing on with it to Mundus...but he IS an asshole, and he was trying to get Mundus so ****ed he's leave the gate unguarded. It could have been handled better, but the arguement is now "it's not human, KILL IT WITH FIRE!" DANTE recognized that a life is still a life and promised Lilith that she and teh baby would live if she cooperated; VERGIL violated that promise and killed her.
Dude you sorta forgot that the baby was still ilnside Lilith... what would she have done after Mundus dies? Seriously.No, for me it's more of a failure to capitaliize on a potentially interesting plot hook or explore the character's reactions to something seriously morally dark.
Let's say if Vergil killed the mother but adopted the child as a protege, or if Dante realised that he's allowed himself to become a bigot by casually condoning the murder of an innocent being.
You know, something. ANYTHING.
You can apply that logic to Etnad and Vergin, so I agree wholeheartedly.
You forgot that Dante doesn't start out the conversation with that comment on his child. He seriously wanted to avoid delving so low....Demon Baby still equals "BABY", and as proven by Sparda AND Phineas, Demon's are not by default going to be evil, that's just how they get conditioned to be. Look carefully at Vergil's face right after he fires, he's horrified with what he just did and the implications of what it means. They did miss a huge character development hook, and I am a bit disgusted with how they wrote Dante as just railing on with it to Mundus...but he IS an asshole, and he was trying to get Mundus so ****ed he's leave the gate unguarded. It could have been handled better, but the arguement is now "it's not human, KILL IT WITH FIRE!" DANTE recognized that a life is still a life and promised Lilith that she and teh baby would live if she cooperated; VERGIL violated that promise and killed her.
They did miss a huge character development hook, and I am a bit disgusted with how they wrote Dante as just railing on with it to Mundus...but he IS an asshole, and he was trying to get Mundus so ****ed he's leave the gate unguarded.
...Demon Baby still equals "BABY", and as proven by Sparda AND Phineas, Demon's are not by default going to be evil, that's just how they get conditioned to be. Look carefully at Vergil's face right after he fires, he's horrified with what he just did and the implications of what it means. They did miss a huge character development hook, and I am a bit disgusted with how they wrote Dante as just railing on with it to Mundus...but he IS an asshole, and he was trying to get Mundus so ****ed he's leave the gate unguarded. It could have been handled better, but the arguement is now "it's not human, KILL IT WITH FIRE!" DANTE recognized that a life is still a life and promised Lilith that she and teh baby would live if she cooperated; VERGIL violated that promise and killed her.
Well at this scene i was more ****ed that vergil shot the chick and Kat was put in danger...... Then i got really mad when Kat didnt like instantly hit the ground when bullets was flying..... then i just got mad that everyone aim was sooo bad