Language.
People LOVE that version for some reason, and I'm still completely oblivious as to why. He isn't half as interesting, well-portrayed, or likable as his past or later incarnations
No. Use common sense and don't be vulgar. With dick as long as you're talking about a 1940's private eye or a dude named Richard you're good but if you can't say the female equivalent why would you be able to the male? You can say blow when it's not in a vulgar context, just use common sense.Aren't words allowed by the swear filter permitted?
I don't remember him ever acting like people couldn't talk smack about DmC Dante, just also part of the group that's there to correct people when they let their massive hatred towards pretty much everything DmC spout nonsense about the character and his development when they are objectively wrong.Aren't words allowed by the swear filter permitted?
And probably you always will be oblivious so my advice is don't even bother with your constant rants about it (I don't know why rants about say, DmC are condemned but your constant barking against DMC3 are condoned btw), which frankly, at this point are really starting to lose credibility, they're so repetitive.
.
I don't remember him ever acting like people couldn't talk smack about DmC Dante
Sounds to me like you just don't wanna hear why certain people think the obnoxious wanna-be Ninja Turtle Dante isn't cool because he's your favorite.
It's not like certain people on here have let up on their DmC bashing every time its brought up (it's even in this thread), and I don't see you stepping in and telling them to cool it.
Geez, he's talking about a fictional character.
The same can be said for some people like the only guy to like your post. Every time the chance rises, they're there to tell everyone how much they hate DmC. Yet you don't say anything. Nobody said anything because quite frankly, we don't care.Yeah... I know. In fact I already told you three times that Dante is not the point.
The point is how spamming rants about the same thing hitting the same points countless times every chance presented is annoying and obnoxious, and my incredulity at the fact that this is recognized for some people but not for this guy. The subject of said broken record kinda rants ain't the point. I told you the same thing about your repetitive rants about BvS, remember? Was BvS itself the point I was making? No. The same thing here. Please get it.
The same can be said for some people like the only guy to like your post. Every time the chance rises, they're there to tell everyone how much they hate DmC. Yet you don't say anything.
So, he can totally do this if he wants.
That rule about bashing DmC was made only because so many ridiculous fans were specifically going out of their way to absolutely saturate the forums with negativity surrounding the reboot for its existence alone. The only point was to hate, hate, and hate because it was a thing. This is when the fans were really ridiculous. Making petitions to get it pulled from store shelves and what not. This was in the early days.I told you, there already is a rule tackling DmC specifically. And I can tell you something similar as well, you never defended anyone who went on bashing DMC4. This point of yours goes nowhere.
Well, there is at least one staff member that doesn't completely agree, and recognizes that spewing repetitive rants over and over whenever the opportunity presents itself is an issue.
And man, this is not petty. It has to do with a person's ability to enjoy the forum. Why do you think the anti anti-DmC rule was even made? Because there were people who took every chance they saw to throw poop at the game, constantly, intoxicating the atmosphere for everybody. It's only fair to apply the same reasoning the same way towards everyone, not just those who like to bash DmC, cause the consequence is the same. See what I'm saying? It's not "every now and then" either btw.
No one is saying you can't criticize and make fun of the game though.
Right. It's clearly objectively untrue.By the way, it isn't subjective.
"Advice"? What advice? When have you ever given me advice on anything to do with discussing DMC? And even if you did, what's to be advised about? Policing the opinions of other people?And probably you always will be oblivious so my advice is don't even bother with your constant rants about it
Because my criticism of DMC3, or "barking" as you put it, was never and is not backed by entitled whining or blind hatred which I inexplicably spread around the forum like peanut butter. I cut together a lengthy, 8-page long rant venting about everything I don't like about the game, each word of which I stand by to this very day without hesitation, that I can call upon as an argument I actually tried to construct.(I don't know why rants about say, DmC are condemned but your constant barking against DMC3 are condoned btw)
Yes. I'm hammering the same points constantly because they're the points that matter, that bother me the most, that have relevance in the scheme of my argument against the game.which frankly, at this point are really starting to lose credibility, they're so repetitive.
YES. EXACTLY.All those reasons you listed are just you.
Tell me, oh wise Demosthenes...You don't get to decide what's interesting, or funny, or likeable, etc. All those things are subjective. What interests me can be uninteresting for someone else, what's funny to me may not be for someone else, what is likeable to me may be unlikeable for someone else.
*SIGH.*Since you seem to be struggling with this basic concept, I think you'll always be baffled by the people who like DMC3 Dante, no matter how many times or how well they explain it to you.
....So just give it a break, for your own mental health, and ours.
That's not even the point. The point is his repeated, borderline spammy rants about the same thing, hitting the same points over and over and over again.
The thing I'm talking about is merely Wolf's behavior that I mentioned above, not Dante, not DMC3. There are a couple of people here who don't like DMC3 Dante. YOU don't like DMC3 Dante. Yet I don't see you or those people go on constant rants about it. He's pretty much doing what your average DmC hater does, except he's a hater of another game.
Cause there already is a forum rule against bashing DmC, if you remember. As if you ever stepped in to cool anyone who bashed DMC4 whenever they felt like it anyway.
The point is, why are people to be condemned when they throw manure at DmC every chance they get while if Wolf does the same exact thing just with another game, even in unrelated threads, he gets a pass?
If you really believe that, I invite you to check out that little essay I linked earlier, because that pretty much sums up my thoughts on the game's story and writing better than I can here. If you feel any strong obligation to voice any disagreement with it, and want to do so rationally and thoughtfully, we can always discuss it via PM.Right. It's clearly objectively untrue.
Because not only is the criticism about his general behavior, something that each person might find subjective (And if I might say, Dante in 1 was little different), it's about the actual writing and development he goes through, something that Wolf insists is completely badly done or nonexistent.
Firstly, I can't quite agree with your assessment of DMC3's combat system and how it plays. Initially, it can be difficult to come to terms with - The slow, almost static, oftentimes pre-placed camera is offputting at the beginning, you feel as though you have little control over it. But as time went on I grew accustomed, and realized that it's like that by design, you're not intended to constantly be moving the camera's position with the right stick, you're supposed to let it sit. Rather than force the camera and Dante into alignment, you learn to use the directional inputs based on Dante's orientation, not yours.If you really believe that, I invite you to check out that little essay I linked earlier, because that pretty much sums up my thoughts on the game's story and writing better than I can here. If you feel any strong obligation to voice any disagreement with it, and want to do so rationally and thoughtfully, we can always discuss it via PM.