Same goes for you pal. You obviously don't look deep enough into things.But, you know, believe what you want, even when it runs in contradiction to series canon.
Same goes for you pal. You obviously don't look deep enough into things.But, you know, believe what you want, even when it runs in contradiction to series canon.
Objection. It's a ploy to please the Nero fans and make the other individuals displeased by his presence tolerate him, by giving a meaningful reason for the character's existence.It's also continuity breaking, as well as very out of character for Vergil to sleep with any human woman, let alone a prostitute in Fortuna as the novel Deadly Fortune tried to suggest. The timelines don't match up at all, nor does characterizations and plots; Nero being Vergil's son would be just a bone toss to please vergil fans that "something still remained". Yeah, something got left behind; it's called Yamato, which is actually one of SPARDA's swords, not a blade vergil made and is all his own.
Also, Vergil's legacy was ironically Agnus' demonic infusion program; it's specifically mentioned in the enemy data that the Bianco Angelos and Alto Angelos were created using "fragments of the Black Angel".
You got that right. Except I'm not THAT big Nero fan, but I like Vergil's character.Objection. It's a ploy to please the Nero fans and make the other individuals displeased by his presence tolerate him, by giving a meaningful reason for the character's existence.
I think Nero is Vergil's kid, and here's how. DMC1 is ten years before DMC3, and DMC4 is some years after 1.
Nero is between 17 and 19, and judging by Lady, about that time has passed between 3 and 4. So, Nero could have been either a newborn or a couple months old during the events of 3. Lucky it wasn't Vergil's day to watch him!
They state in the games that 3 takes place 10 years after Eva's death, and 1 takes place 20 years after Eva's death. How can 4 take place then in 1 is already confirmed to take place during that time?