Kind of wish they had level 5 styles for Dante , imagine a level 5 swordmaster with an entirely new moveset for dsd
Oh the possibilities
Oh the possibilities
Anybody misses Crazy Dance?
Or everyone around here are okay with the "home run" smash for Dance Macabre instead?
Crazy dance was cooler imo
No but some key people are necessary. For a graphical update you just need a skilled team but for a remake there is a finer art than just changing all the things people didn't like.And you don't need the whole team.
Yeah, great, except that no one ever said they didn't want a RE2 remake, in fact, the announcement was basically an 'ok, we hear you. You win. We do it.' After RE1 Remake and its take on the original RE2 was the single most demanded game in the history of capcom anything.Coincidentally, Kamiya and Sugimura were also involved in RE2 and they weren't present when that game was remade.
And it's common knowledge how well-received the remake is.
You don't need the exact same director or producer from 10-20 years ago.
Yasuhiro Anpo was a programmer then but was promoted to director over the years and went back to direct the RE2 remake.
Yoshiaki Hirabayashi wasn't even around in 1998 but worked his way up from being a motion capture engineer in REmake to becoming producers for multiple RE titles, including the RE2 remake.
I can debate the success of this interpretation later but the fundamental difference here is that for RE2 they were going for the spirit of the game. In DMC's case they wouldn't try to replicate the game's fundamental core, they'd try to replace it with with what DMC3, 4 and 5 have and, fundamentally, those game are nothing like 1. They'd be turning the game into something that's more in line with those games because of 5's success. If that's the case I'd rather have them to do a DMC3 remake, instead. For that I'd be down right ecstatic, but for a DMC1 remake to just be another one of those, as I already said, leave it alone.The RE2 remake changed the "fundamental elements" and people loved it.
Again. No, they didn't, they were demanding it. It's not something that came about despite the fans, it came about because of them.RE2 fanboys said the same thing over the years:
Now you're just being condescending."Don't touch my beloved classic"
"Don't you dare step on my nostalgia"
That wasn't the debate. That was the question. In all the discussions I saw, yeah, there were a lot of people saying something to that effect but the larger body of the debate was a question of whether or not they'd turn it into an over the shoulder shooter and on occasion it was also questions of them turning it into a 1st person like RE7. The hope was for a fixed camera but the possibility of it being over the shoulder was always in the debate because of broad accessibility and everyone knew it was a possibility. Rarely, if ever, was the majority this naggy childish bunch you're alluding to."Don't turn RE2 into another soulless over-the-shoulder action game that's over-saturating the market"
It's all just hating change for the sake of hating change until it happens.
So, hateful and close minded. I seem to be a rather boorish individual. I'm sure the same could be said about everyone that disliked DmC. After all, it's a similar hate and close mindedness is what canned any change that game had for a sequel and made DMC5 possible.You don't have to like change but demanding that "everyone" needs to leave the game alone is, for the lack of a better word, closed minded.
What update?Anyone know what the update to DMC5 was for today ?