moseslmpg
Well-known Member
I wasn't even responding to Dread originally, that's the thing. He just said that there's no proof that Sparda is stronger. I'm not arguing against a theory he has or anything like that. I was originally correcting KOH's assertion that Dante was more powerful than Sparda.Chloe_Ryder;263479 said:Who said Nero's 'raw' power exceeds Dante and Sparda? That's just ridiculous. 'Raw' does not mean more powerful. It means wild, untamed, yet to be mastered. Sparda trained Dante and Vergil, which is why Dante was capable of beating Nero and Sanctus etc etc. Ugh, anyway, actually don't even respond to that, because the theory is not believable at all.
The novel said Dante thinks in terms of raw power, Nero is stronger than him. By the logic of anyone who believes Dante is more powerful than Sparda, then Nero is also more powerful than Sparda. Raw in this sense means like total, like if they were in a bench pressing contest. It is very ridiculous, even without the comparison to Sparda, which is another reason I call shenanigans on the DMC4 novel.
I don't think there's any reason to carry on this little debate about Sparda being weaker than any of his lineage. I've made my point, and you've made your point, as to exactly why Sparda is unlikely to be used in the same sentence as 'weak'. Why call DT out on proving his theory if we've already presented enough reason to debunk his theory? It's asking for trouble, that's what it is. Leave dead-ends dead, and let's get back to the actual topic discussion, yes?
But you're right, I have made my point. It is just a habit I have to keep arguing until the other person concedes (if they are wrong), or until they remove their position from the argument. I don't see the big deal with that really. How are arguments meant to be carried out on this forum anyway? I'm serious, someone VM or PM about this.