ThanksNew design for Vergil DmC acquired (coming soon).
ThanksNew design for Vergil DmC acquired (coming soon).
Ah, somehow skipped this. Sounds great, something I'd definitely read! In general I love themes that somehow circle around the moral concept of "If you don't look at those problems, they don't exist, so just look at the great things and you'll be happy". (*cough* Huxley knew his stuff here with Brave New World) There are so many ways to write about that, it never grows old, and I assume there's at least a world-building-related implication of such?All too happy to oblige. ^^ Here's the (working) summary:
The original “Iron Man” script was decidedly pacifist, with protagonist Tony Stark attempting to use his enormous manufacturing empire to battle against war profiteers and the military industrial complex. However, after the Pentagon got involved, with Philip Strub again acting as the military liaison, the tone of the movie was radically altered. Much of the fighting in the movie takes place in modern-day Afghanistan, with the U.S. military serving the role of the good guys. In this sense, the film’s stance on war was reversed.
In exchange, the production agreement notes that the military would allow the movie to be shot at Edwards Air Force Base, just north of Los Angeles; provide “approximately 150 extras at Edwards AFB to play military members from various services and Afghan nationals;” help produce around 100 uniforms; and provide the opportunity to use a range of expensive aircraft.
Tom Secker, when asked by MintPress to assess the U.S. film industry’s role in prolonging the Afghan war, responded:
Hollywood’s coverage of NATO’s war in Afghanistan has been notable by its absence, its silence, and its use of contextless microcosms which represent the war, rather than explore or explain it. “Iron Man” and “Lone Survivor” — two Pentagon-supported blockbusters — are both set during the U.S. occupation, but the scale of that occupation and the mess it was making of the country are ignored by both narratives, in favor of tightly-focused cinematic synecdoches which conveniently avoid the suffering of everyone involved.
Secker concluded:
In that sense, of course Hollywood has played a crucial role in perpetuating the war. They either failed to remind people that the war was still going on, or painted it in heroic, decontextualized colors that make it seem like a benevolent adventure halfway round the world, rather than the crushing, destructive geopolitical ratf#ck it truly is.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/pentagon-leaned-hollywood-sell-war-afghanistan/278568/
Anyone remember when I said that
"if ANY other country's government/military were involved in script approval for fiction pieces that are supposed to be otherwise apolitical, for the government/military to dictate how they can or cannot be portrayed, where every single war crime or human rights violation the entity does isn't a direct result of how it functions but an "individual A-hole issue", "in the past", and "oops it was Nazis/aliens/etc that corrupted our otherwise good institution the whole time!" otherwise the film doesn't get made the way the writer intends or it doesn't get their money, it'd be called propaganda" ?
Yeah. I haven't changed my mind about it.
Ah, somehow skipped this. Sounds great, something I'd definitely read! In general I love themes that somehow circle around the moral concept of "If you don't look at those problems, they don't exist, so just look at the great things and you'll be happy". (*cough* Huxley knew his stuff here with Brave New World) There are so many ways to write about that, it never grows old, and I assume there's at least a world-building-related implication of such?
Thank you! <3 If/when I finish it, I'd be happy to share bits of it. And same; there's just something intriguing about the concept, especially when you realize how much it mimics reality.
CT: The support forum I attend has offered me an Advisor position and wants to talk over Zoom before making it official. A little nervous, but happy, too. Especially if it results in helping others out.
My boss goes on leave back in August and the gas companies start collapsing.
My boss goes on leave over this weekend and the rest of us get Covid symptoms.
I'm sensing the beginning of a pattern, here...
Alert......PewDiePie reference detected .I'm sensing the beginning of a pattern, here...
Art is dead the moment it gets political.
Not to sound posh, but that's not true at all. Look at Dante Alighieri's work, or Alessandro Manzoni (mentioning ones I studied in high school). Both extraordinary artists, and both very much political. Politics and good art are not mutually exclusive. Or not necessarily at least.
----------
Beat Nioh. Tried some of the endgame sub missions but they're cheap, unfair, bullshit ass double boss missions. They're beatable but not fun at all, they mostly consist of a lot of running around trying to isolate one of them and then spamming Iai Quickdraw. Very limited combo possibility which is what I'm playing for.
Guess I'll tackle the DLCs then.
*readies Harry Potter book to smack you with*// To add... most of the best works of speculative fiction I've ever read also include a critical view of politics. Yea... Didn't think this through, I thought only about voluntary or involuntary restrictions to artistic freedom *facepalm*
You should use Order of the Phoniex this time. That thing is huge .*readies Harry Potter book to smack you with*
Just say when....
I thought we were discussing about literature as art lmao*readies Harry Potter book to smack you with*
Just say when....
I find Goblet of Fire to be a perfectly serviceable book to smack people upside the head with. The difference between it and OotP is over 100 pages, though, so I just might reconsider.You should use Order of the Phoniex this time. That thing is huge .
No, I'm just slapping you with a hardcover book because you said something dumb and didn't think it through. There's really nothing to it than that. Sometimes a book smack is just a book smack.I thought we were discussing about literature as art lmao
... unless you are seeking to smack me with the writer's ridiculous attempt to make it a political masterpiece...
In that case... ProceedNo, I'm just slapping you with a hardcover book because you said something dumb and didn't think it through. There's really nothing to it than that. Sometimes a book smack is just a book smack.