I have no proof of IGN being bribed about DmC.
But isnt the stuff i posted about Mass effect 3 and Battlefield 4 not evidence of bribery involving IGN?It's evidence that IGN is biased just like any other gaming site. It shows that what they gain is a peak in page views. There is no actual proof for bribery.
Then wouldnt that support the fact that IGN gave a soft review of DmC for sake of beneficial gain such as exclusive videos? Or maybe somone who liked the game hapened to review it? Which is biased, but not biased based on a bribe. Is it so hard to think that maybe IGN was not bribed?
I swear discussing with you gives me a headache, and i am not trying to be mean.
You're not coming across as mean. You're coming across as stubborn and convinced that you are right. No one is right. All there is here is bias because you don't like the game.
Its just i point to Battlefield 4 evidence of bribery
And u totally ignore it and go talking about something that is irelevant
It's not evidence. How is that evidence. One code.
IGN being bribed with Mass Effect 3 and Battlefield 4 supports my claim that IGN are corrupt and could have been paid off for DmC, more than yours taht they were simply biased.
There is no evidence to support your claims. You sais yourself that you have no proff, but now you say you have proof? You're going in circles.
And exlusive videos as you pointed out gives more viewer ratings. But who gave that exclusive gameplay video of DmC to IGN? Capcom.We know that. But this topic is on about monetary bribes. You think this is a shocking revelation that a gaming company would give a site exclisive coverage? Guess what, it's not.
Dont you think Capcom simply said "Hey have this for free!"?