We have very different views on the world. You believe the world is black and white. I think that the world and people are so complex and morality so gray that I could spend the rest of my life writing about it and only ever understand a small portion of it.
God doesn't outright "say" anything. A book based on what he says is where we are getting all this from. The book was written by men. Not God. So what you are asking me is this: would I rather take to heart a book written thousands of years ago by men that has been changed and things omitted and added in overtime, or modern science with actual concrete evidence and findings. I choose science.
And besides, if you want to go by what the Bible says then women are inferior to men, men cannot shave, no one can eat pork, etc.
The Bible was written by men guided by the Holy Spirit. You shouldn't underestimate God's power. If He can keep the world going like clockwork, don't you think He can manage to get His word out to us, too? Just because it was written by men you can't discredit it by saying so.
You're forgetting that scientists are also only men.
Has science proven that the soul exists? Is there evidence to support the idea that we have souls? No. But then how can you know whether or not the soul is present from the moment of conception or not? How can you tell when a soul embodies its vessel? There are no answers for that yet, but scientists are the people who try to make sense of things. To prove or disprove. There is no evidence indicating that we
don't have souls, so where does that leave us?
Medical science taught me that a heartbeat signifies life. If you're a paramedic, the first thing you check is a person's vital signs, their pulse, is there a heartbeat. Breathing doesn't necessarily mean you're alive or dead. You get all kinds of poisons that can slow the heart down so much that it would be near impossible to detect any breathing, but that's why you rely on the heart to tell you whether someone is alive or not.
A baby's heart starts beating at 3-4 weeks.
The majority of women only realise they are pregnant around this stage, or a week or so later. i.e. they find out they're expecting when
life has already taken hold. Anyone who finds out their expecting before this time...yeah, right, I'm still waiting to see that happen.
That aside, science also teaches that life begins at conception. Since this new life possesses human DNA and is the offspring of human parents, it can legitimately only be described as human life.
Since there can be no question that human zygotes, embryos and fetuses are alive, some have attempted to claim that human beings are not "persons," until some threshold is crossed, such as viability, the capacity to feel pain, birth, or even the first year after birth. The merits of such notions can be debated, but it should be clear that they are not based on science but rather on ideology, philosophy or
belief.
The whole idea on it just being 'a clump of lifeless, numb tissue' is also a tricky one. It's the blueprint of an individual. It's got all the DNA right for its personality, its gender, it is a unique, living clump of cells that, if given the time to, will develop into a human being. It is a human being. It can't be 'a clump of tissue'. That's what we call poop or tumours or frostbite. It can't be anything BUT a human being. Its parents are human, it was conceived by a human, it could only be a human.
As Shakespeare said, you can call a rose by any other name, it will still smell as sweet. It is what it is.
By the way, I'd also just want to apologise to anyone who has had an abortion. I don't mean to offend or hurt. I feel very strongly that abortion is not the solution and that many women are suckered into getting abortions because they are unwilling or scared to look at the reality. I'm much more for the notion that women should rather be empowered and encouraged when they find out their pregnant, rather than someone saying yeah, you know what, kids aren't for you, you can't do this, let's get this sorted out for you. Motherhood is the single most greatest event that will change your life and move your heart in a way that you just CAN'T understand until you experience it.
Anyway back to your post, I think your feminism is tainting your view of women in the Bible. Yeah they weren't exactly wearing pants and ordering their husbands around, but the Bible teaches that the woman is the BACKBONE of men. Two heads are better than one. God CREATED women because that's what men NEEDED. To reproduce, to nurse, to heal, to feed, to grow, to comfort, to love, someone to talk to, someone to lean on. So I'm really really sorry if I offend you with this but the Bible does NOT teach that women are inferior to men, it teaches that women are ESSENTIAL to man's survival.
That puts women
equal to men, one can do it, but two can do it better.
And I'm honestly hoping that your mention of shaving and pork is a joke. I mean, really, taking past events out of context in the Bible is a very silly thing to do.