Darth Angelo;265979 said:
Everything Vergil will ever and has ever cared about worth telling = Sparda's power
We have already seen him fail at beating Dante twice and faught him six times if he comes back in a sequel it's going to be the same story as 3 all over again. Even if he doesn't the whole sibling rivalry thing has run it's course now anyway. Dante is always going to stop Vergil in everything he ever tries to do I would rather not play the same plot over and over and over just because Vergil is badass. Just like I would not want DMC5 to not be another Nero damsel in distress love story.
Part of what makes me prefer Nero over Vergil is that we actually don't know where it's going yet, at least not for sure. It's keeping the series fresh and not regurgitating the same successful story time and time again.
Your logic is pretty flawed. How can you justify Dante in 4 games then, when we know pretty much everything about him, but then saying that having Vergil in one game is enough to exhaust all the potential of his story. That is just dumb. The highlighted portion is excessively dumb.
Italics: Yeah, I guess if we got something right we wouldn't want to keep doing it right, huh? If it ain't broke, break it :wacko:
Vergil'sB*tch;265983 said:
i'm gonna say it, why is everyone so 'obsessed' about bringing Vergie back.
A better question is why are peopl so obsessed with him not coming back? It seems like after DMC4 people have started hating Vergil just to be "cool" and contrarian.
Departed means dead. Vergil is DEAD!
I see no point in bringing back a character whose story has run its course. (Yeah, of course I'm a Vergil fan, i just don't want to see his character ruined anymore than what it has been in the novel.)
Again, logic is flawed. According to the DMC4 Recap, Vergil was dead before DMC1, in which case, death is really no big deal.
The part in parentheses is a valid concern, but an unreasonable one. Dante's character is being ruined, so why not bring Vergil back?
Now, if we can get back to the question. So far, I have seen only 2 sort of valid objections against Vergil coming back, and they are more circumstantial than anything. There is:
1. His return is unwarranted. (Not really valid, since this depends on what story they come up with. They can easily create a plot that necessitates his return, which seems to be the direction they were going with Nero).
2. Don't want his character ruined. (Not really valid, because it assumes the only way Vergil could come back was if his character was ruined.)
I'm not seeing anything that necessarily says he shouldn't come back. For instance, if he came back and his return was warranted, and there was more of his story left to tell, and his character wasn't ruined, and they didn't rehash the same old story, hypothetically, then why wouldn't people want him back? These are the answers I'm interested in.
Also, considering that Dante is the biggest offender when it comes to all these things, do you want him back?
VB: Nothing there precludes a return; people have come back from being way deader than that. In fact, it doesn't even say he's dead, and if his soul can inhabit an inert demonic body, then he is basically alive. Don't hide behind shoddily interpreted canon to justify your lack of imagination, it's disgusting. That goes for all of you.