• Welcome to the Devil May Cry Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Devil May Cry series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

do you think the real devil may cry 5 in development right now by capcom ?

Yeah capcom only wants money as far as i concern.Well guess what capcom?I'm pretty sure you'll gonna get more and more money because of RE:6.
 
If only hideki kamiya didn't leave then this wouldn't happen.
Ahhh imagining hideki kamiya and hideaki itsuno working together for a new DMC or the reboot.Now that sounds awesome,for me at least.

^This.
Definitely, this.

And for once, let Capcom cater to what the fans want and like see how good it'll make them feel? 8D Be all warm and fuzzy inside. They'll get more money if the fans love it that much. Some people even go buy two or three copies for preservation purposes.
 
Eh yeah kinda awkward he was overacting like a jerk and his cowboy costume sucked IMO

I mean just look at this >>

EDIT: His overacting was OKAY only when he was young but when he's aged he shouldn't behave like an impudent fool he should be more like DMC1's dante kinda like brad-pitt
But in the end, weren't we all satisfied? :troll:
 
But in the end, weren't we all satisfied? :troll:
images

No i wasn't i was bored after finishing the son of sparda mode and IMHO dante sucked big time DMC1 dante should've been there
 
DMC3 was a prequel that was loosely connected to DMC1. Yes Dante is younger and yes he meets his brother, but it wasn't like that in DMC1. The best thing about playing dmc through chronologically is dmc3 to dmc1 and that's only because, i think, they matured him well. But the story has holes and it doesn't make sense.
I beleive I stated earlier that most long term fiction will have plot holes and don't always make sense. And I don't think DMC3 was loosely connected to the story it WAS connected. Regardless of how you play it or what order, DMC3 was still something new and fresh.


And then their are people who don't mind something new and way out there.


I don't mind new things, but something as extreme as a reboot is not what I had in mind.


Basically the DMC series is only as big as it is, is because of gameplay.


Well, then if some people only play for gameplay then those type of fans shouldn't care where the story goes so why change it?


I understand that Rueben played a good cocky narrow minded demon slayer but considering dmc1 and 2 already have his attitude laid out, why made him suddenly act goofier than he was when he was at his youngest? (to many dante's)
You'll have to ask Capcom that one. I guess someone in the office decided Dante's flaunty side needed to be enhanced, whatever they were thinking it worked.


Trust me, I was sitting around waiting for the next new game, 2 years ago. But my anticipation wasn't as big as it was when dmc4 was announced.

Neither was mine, I tried to be obtimistic, like I am now. When RE5 came out I was bummed out with the story, and even though it's not exactly what I want, they have fixed a few things up and it's the same game, I never in a million years thought id be excited for RE6 after I got done with 5.

Although i still think DMC5 would be a fun game but what else is there? DMC1 covered all the bases.

Just because one can't see how something can be done, doesn't mean it can't. The whole time I watched Death Note the first time kept thinking, "Now there is no way he can...well how are they gonna...how do they plan on?" and so on.
Is Dante gonna come back from hell and meet angels then? Prequels are only good if the main character drastically changes somehow and becomes who you seen and love. There's noone else, besides Sparda, that i'd like to see something of. And if Capcom can write a story around that then great! But i highly doubt that. Perhaps DmC will tell its own story instead.

Well, I never said it absolutely had to be prequels, sequels can patch things up if done well. Capcom could have released some official file to make things right and release another game that was done right, but instead we got a half a$$ed manga that contridicts game material itself and just created more plot holes. If they couldn't do something so simple as to find a better fanfic to publish then DmC may not be any different, regardless of what company is doing it.
 
But in the end, weren't we all satisfied? :troll:

Oh, I know I was. 8D Because to play the game when I couldn't get it on Xbox yet...I had to play in computer shops, shove away those DoTA players from my usual unit and finish a stage or two before class started. Satisfied. Yes, yes, I was. 8D Button mashing the keyboard was just heavenly.
 
No. DmC is DMC in a parallel world. Parallel world =/= reboot. Two different things man.
I don't want to seem disrespectful, but I think you're being too idealistic. A reboot can be a parallel world if you think about it, first of all. And if they weren't going to replace Devil May Cry, why is DmC here? I understand if it were like Final Fantasy and Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles, for example, but it's not.
 
I don't want to seem disrespectful, but I think you're being too idealistic. A reboot can be a parallel world if you think about it, first of all. And if they weren't going to replace Devil May Cry, why is DmC here? I understand if it were like Final Fantasy and Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles, for example, but it's not.

No need to jump to conclusions. We don't know if it will replace the original series or not. Only time will tell.
 
Honestly, I wouldn't care if it does. (Everyone grabs their pitchforks) Hold on, hear me out... Now, what do we know about DmC exactly? Not much gameplay has been showed, and visually the game looks great. Not much of the story is known, but it has a very interesting setting (Limbo City) which is a stark contrast to other games dark, gothic setting. While this retains gothic elements, it's a more vibrant, colorful enviroment. Not only that, the city is everchanging. And the combat doesn't looks that different from previous games. Yes, there is the new Dante, but he could be a fresh start from the everchanging, moody, douche bag Dante we know. He could be a more grounded character, with a more interesting psyche than the other. And while classic Dante looked more relaxed, this Dante looks... angry. Like he has a purpose, a true goal. I'm more and more interested to see the turn out.
 
No need to jump to conclusions. We don't know if it will replace the original series or not. Only time will tell.
Yeah Only time will tell but look at the facts. capcom doesn't know how to continue with DMC. They don't know how to continue after DMC2 and they've been avoiding it for years so... re BOOT a new start with a different character. I don't know why people still can't understand that... D*C is meant to replace DMC.
 
I don't want to seem disrespectful, but I think you're being too idealistic. A reboot can be a parallel world if you think about it, first of all. And if they weren't going to replace Devil May Cry, why is DmC here? I understand if it were like Final Fantasy and Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles, for example, but it's not.
Yeah, it could, but Ninja Theory took over a year to give a clear statement on what DmC was. First they called it an origin story, then they called it a reboot/rebirth, and now it's DMC in a parallel world? They also wanted fans to know that the old Dante was safe and sound. Hm? I think that just implies that DMC could continue in the future after this DmC takes it's toll. No one knows whether DmC will replace DMC or not. I'm not against DmC but I'm against the possibility of it replacing the old one. If it weren't for the old DMC, we wouldn't even have a fan based site like we have now. DmC is cool but it's not what I got into first.

IMO DMC was fine the way it was, and didn't need a "reboot".

Everyone was angry about DmC at first. Now we got used to it, maybe a bit too comfortable for my tastes, to a point where some people at this site are going "Idgaf if DmC replaces DMC"? What the hell?

It seriously does look good but I'm already used to one franchise. A franchise that happens to have an already established fan base. I was so loyal, holy shyit. I'll give it a shot, but no way in hell will I say "DmC needs to replace old DMC".

It's not hard to explain all the plot holes that are in DMC. Some of you guys act like it's impossible. LOL. Yeah, to explain one character's origins (Nero), and to make a bad sequel look good (DMC2).

Notice Dante isn't cocky in DMC2? Sure, his attitude may have been a rushed product of Capcom's. But why not make a rushed product look good if you want to SAVE your franchise? Idk, I think the next DMC should've took place between DMC4 and DMC2. Something tragic happens in Dante's life, like maybe losing Trish and Lady. The reason for them being gone may be due to his cocky attitude, which is why it's gone in DMC2.

Anything would've been better than DmC really. Not calling it a bad product but wow, since when the fuhk was it a good idea to start a new series without finishing the old one?
 
Yeah, it could, but Ninja Theory took over a year to give a clear statement on what DmC was. First they called it an origin story, then they called it a reboot/rebirth, and now it's DMC in a parallel world? They also wanted fans to know that the old Dante was safe and sound. Hm? I think that just implies that DMC could continue in the future after this DmC takes it's toll. No one knows whether DmC will replace DMC or not. I'm not against DmC but I'm against the possibility of it replacing the old one. If it weren't for the old DMC, we wouldn't even have a fan based site like we have now. DmC is cool but it's not what I got into first.

IMO DMC was fine the way it was, and didn't need a "reboot".

Everyone was angry about DmC at first. Now we got used to it, maybe a bit too comfortable for my tastes, to a point where some people at this site are going "Idgaf if DmC replaces DMC"? What the hell?

It seriously does look good but I'm already used to one franchise. A franchise that happens to have an already established fan base. I was so loyal, holy shyit. I'll give it a shot, but no way in hell will I say "DmC needs to replace old DMC".

It's not hard to explain all the plot holes that are in DMC. Some of you guys act like it's impossible. LOL. Yeah, to explain one character's origins (Nero), and to make a bad sequel look good (DMC2).

Notice Dante isn't cocky in DMC2? Sure, his attitude may have been a rushed product of Capcom's. But why not make a rushed product look good if you want to SAVE your franchise? Idk, I think the next DMC should've took place between DMC4 and DMC2. Something tragic happens in Dante's life, like maybe losing Trish and Lady. The reason for them being gone may be due to his cocky attitude, which is why it's gone in DMC2.

Anything would've been better than DmC really. Not calling it a bad product but wow, since when the fuhk was it a good idea to start a new series without finishing the old one?
Well a lot of people hate dmc2 and even capcom tries too keep it out of their mouths when ever possible. So why would they care about dmc2 at all? Thats the only reason i can see why in dmc4 dante was so goofy and also because dmc3 Dante's personality was a favorite for most people so they just stuck with it instead of trying to close gaps. I still say it needs to be a manga or anime to clean up the whole franchise. I can't be bothered with anything less than a Sparda prequel.
The story goes all over the place with no continuity. DMC had a great run and dmc4 was the nail in the coffin. Capcom had no intention of giving Dante's story any closure, instead they wanted to make the gameplay more exciting. Which should be the goal of any game creator.
 
Yeah Only time will tell but look at the facts. capcom doesn't know how to continue with DMC. They don't know how to continue after DMC2 and they've been avoiding it for years so... re BOOT a new start with a different character. I don't know why people still can't understand that... D*C is meant to replace DMC.

Looking at the facts, we still don't know. They haven't made any official announcement about this, so anything can happen in the future. Your conclusions are based on personal feelings and opinions. I can understand why you would draw to such conclusion, but as long there are no hard facts about it, then it is uncertain.
 
No, I don't think DMC5 is in development. It's sad that they're trying to reboot the franchise. It just makes it clear that they messed up with the DMC franchise's story.

Judging from the first DmC trailer, it's going to be all about dumbing people down. I know this sounds like I'm joking, but I'm not. I am not kidding. I don't need the 'white rapper crackhead, smoking Dante in the dimension of terrible graffiti'.

That said, I guess they could make a DMC5 if DmC turned out to be wanting.
 
No, I don't think DMC5 is in development. It's sad that they're trying to reboot the franchise. It just makes it clear that they messed up with the DMC franchise's story.

They may have messed up the story but the combat has gotten better and better with every new addition to the franchise. The only thing i see really wrong with the gameplay is when dmc4 came out and it didn't even make an attempt to try anything different. If dmc4 had DmC gameplay, everyone would of nutted themselves and "came" back for more. But instead they introduced 2 new weapons and a new style. oh and nero too
 
Okay guys lets be optimistic here it only makes things more easier to accept right ?

If DmC turns out to be a crappy game we'll get DMC5 if it doesn't then hey ! why not give DmC a try if its a good game !
 
They may have messed up the story but the combat has gotten better and better with every new addition to the franchise. The only thing i see really wrong with the gameplay is when dmc4 came out and it didn't even make an attempt to try anything different. If dmc4 had DmC gameplay, everyone would of nutted themselves and "came" back for more. But instead they introduced 2 new weapons and a new style. oh and nero too

Well, from what I've seen, the gameplay in DmC is a bit lackluster. It just looks too slow, and maybe less combo-oriented. But hey, to each his own.

DMC4's combat was quite different from that of DMC3, with you being able to switch styles on the fly. And let's not forget the Devil Bringer and its 'snatch' ability.

Nah, I'd rather not see this game turn into a mindless QTE-filled piece of you-know-what.

Nero was a pretty nice character, but it's a shame they didn't figure out a decent background/origins story for him first.
 
Well, from what I've seen, the gameplay in DmC is a bit lackluster. It just looks too slow, and maybe less combo-oriented. But hey, to each his own.
Never watched "the Fight", did you? The tempo is being sucked in by the wide spaces, it's actually just as fast as DMC3.
There was a thread were people proved this, I think.
DMC4's combat was quite different from that of DMC3, with you being able to switch styles on the fly. And let's not forget the Devil Bringer and its 'snatch' ability.
Well, Styles are in and the Snatch is in.
Nero was a pretty nice character, but it's a shame they didn't figure out a decent background/origins story for him first.
Well, what did you expect from Capcom's creative team, really? I am not saying, they are inherently bad, but their efforts have been lacking at best concerning DMC's story.
 
Back
Top Bottom