Okay, so the topic at hand here is that you (CoolDemon) think that Capcom wants to replace the old Dante. You feel that this 'new Dante' threatens the 'old Dante' and you don't like that. I can understand, we all take change bad at times and whatnot. And they never made it clear at first where they were going with this, so I can see how this has enraged some people. But let me say this on the subject...
...Tameem said that he thought what was cool before, isn't cool now. What is old, isn't new and fresh. This is a logical point. Technology moves forwards, not backwards. As does fashion and being cool. Yeah, trends come and go. And at times, technology has to take a step back until it can take a step forward. But in the end, you always end up with something new, different and unique. The very fact that it was Tameem who said this suggests that Capcom still regard Dante as cool. Is Dante still featured in other games other than Devil May Cry? Let's say, Marvel Vs Capcom 3. It's not 'new' Dante we're seeing in there, is it? What does this tell us then? That Dante isn't cool any more? Or that he is replaced, when clearly Capcom have never even hinted that they won't be continuing the Devil May Cry series. And the very fact that it isn't 'reboot' Dante in these other games. Tameem works for Ninja Theory, not Capcom. IF Capcom were stating that they thought Dante wasn't cool any more and everything else, then you could assume that they were trying to get rid of him. They were seeing how another game company (One that is getting off the ground and trying bigger things) would interpret something like Devil May Cry. It's a project, a side project at that. A side project that runs as parallel to the 'real original Devil May Cry series', or whatever you wish to call it. That said, it was not an attempt to try and get rid of the old Dante to replace him with this. Capcom has not said this, neither has Ninja Theory.
And lastly, I find your last post rather odd. To me it seems very contradictory to anything else you have said before. You like the way in which the Tomb Raider reboot is going, but not the way in which this is going. Are we aware that they are making more Tomb Raider games based from the actual original Tomb Raider series, or are we assuming that this is a completely new direction for Tomb Raider and Lara Croft as a whole? I have used the Tomb Raider game as a comparison to this game, and now I see that Tomb Raider does not seem to clarify with an air of certainty that the original series will continue. Whereas with this, it seems quite certain that Devil May Cry will continue with DmC at the sidelines.
Therefore, you accept something totally new like this yet fail to appreciate the move in which Capcom and Ninja Theory made when they have said that DmC is set in a parallel universe, is non canon to DMC and is in its own respect a separate game. The reboot of Lara Croft, is this set in a different universe? Or are we using the 'old' Lara Croft as a template, as you like to call it? It seems to me that the very fact that you pick on others for being a fan of this NEW and supposedly completely different Dante and for supporting or accepting what this game is all about, is rather a bit harsh and unfair. Considering the basis of your previous post.
Surely you CAN'T be a 'true' fan of Lara Croft then, since you 'support' the Tomb Raider reboot. And if that is the case, you can't honestly say that others can't like the old DMC and the new (Even though it's not new, it's just different) DmC. Otherwise myself or anyone else has the right to say to you that you can't possibly like the new Lara Croft and the way in which Tomb Raider is moving forward.
Contradiction, I just find it rather a funny thing.