CoolDemon
X will never be Y
You said "there he is" as in Dante being somewhere? Where (what game are you talking about)?I don't understand the question.
You said "there he is" as in Dante being somewhere? Where (what game are you talking about)?I don't understand the question.
You said "there he is" as in Dante being somewhere? Where (what game are you talking about)?
You said "there he is" as in Dante being somewhere? Where (what game are you talking about)?
Isn't he just beautiful? I love the DMC2 look... *sighs longingly*
Isn't he just beautiful? I love the DMC2 look... *sighs longingly*
If they didn't throw him away (as in keep him the same in DmC) then what's point of two DMC universes then?I'm saying that that boy with the black hair and black coat is Dante, they didn't trow him away, there he is, but they trew away alot of what made him him. So you can look at it in one of two ways: 1 They aren't replacing Dante himself, just most of who he is and 2 They are replacing Dante, they're just keeping one or two characteristics and the name.
I don't know, that picture doesn't really do it for me. I like the DMC2 images better.
DmC dante is referred to as Donte
I don't care much if Dante gets replaced or not at this point. But i just wanted to discuss if that might have been their plan with DmC.
I don't get your point about old and new. Mario hasn't changed in ages, and so hasn't Link. And what about Monkey from Enslaved how is he any way how people are in real life? Since some people bring up the argument that "DmC Dante is easier to relate to than DMC Dante".
And trends and being cool is not important in a video game unless it's what the game is about (the Sims for example). Good gameplay, story, atmosphere, music, etc is. I don't see how DmC and it's character is new or unique. Different it is though. The character is based off DMC Dante. Unique definition means being one of a kind. How is DmC's character that when DMC Dante is the same "kind"?.
Your points are good. I made this topic to discuss and you have brought up some good arguments about why they won't replace Dante.
To just remind you though that Capcom's Pr Manager Leo Tan did say "“I think it’s important that we aren’t ruling out the possibility of a Devil May Cry 5 to continue the story. We just want to see where the reboot goes first, before making any further decisions.”".
I hate the word reboot and rebooting in general. Because it's a cowards way of making games. Instead of trying to be innovative and try to come up with something new they milk exisiting games with reboots of them. For what? Money. But i like how Tomb raider character looks like in the reboot. And if you compare old tombraider game with reboot you will see signficant poorer graphics in old games. So i like graphical improvements that reboots bring and that is why i tolerate such reboots.
But 2008 Prince of Persia and this DmC reboot are reboots i don't tolerate. They are totally unecessary. Instead of fixing DMC story - they decided to make a reboot in other words milk the series. If you find that acceptable then imagine a scenario of Capcom making two more "DMC" universes along with the current two. 1) called dmC 2) dMc. And then there would be total of one DMC game and 3 "DMC" games and the 3 "DMC" (the reboots) games share DMC as template (source of idea, gameplay , character). Would that be ok? No, and neither should one reboot be (especially one that's so different and not necessary).
The true fan thing is something i have cast away. But i believe that we are fan of something more than something else. Because that's how we are in general about interests, friends, idols, characters, series etc.
For example if you had to make a choice because a game company asked you "Do you want us to make sequel to Game A or Game B ?" (and person having to make a choice is fan of both game serie). You can't say both - then which would you choose? Whichever you choose it shows that people can be fans of something more than something else.
I don't care much if Dante gets replaced or not at this point. But i just wanted to discuss if that might have been their plan with DmC.
I don't get your point about old and new. Mario hasn't changed in ages, and so hasn't Link. And what about Monkey from Enslaved how is he any way how people are in real life? Since some people bring up the argument that "DmC Dante is easier to relate to than DMC Dante".
And trends and being cool is not important in a video game unless it's what the game is about (the Sims for example). Good gameplay, story, atmosphere, music, etc is. I don't see how DmC and it's character is new or unique. Different it is though. The character is based off DMC Dante. Unique definition means being one of a kind. How is DmC's character that when DMC Dante is the same "kind"?.
Your points are good. I made this topic to discuss and you have brought up some good arguments about why they won't replace Dante.
To just remind you though that Capcom's Pr Manager Leo Tan did say "“I think it’s important that we aren’t ruling out the possibility of a Devil May Cry 5 to continue the story. We just want to see where the reboot goes first, before making any further decisions.”".
I hate the word reboot and rebooting in general. Because it's a cowards way of making games. Instead of trying to be innovative and try to come up with something new they milk exisiting games with reboots of them. For what? Money. But i like how Tomb raider character looks like in the reboot. And if you compare old tombraider game with reboot you will see signficant poorer graphics in old games. So i like graphical improvements that reboots bring and that is why i tolerate such reboots.
But 2008 Prince of Persia and this DmC reboot are reboots i don't tolerate. They are totally unecessary. Instead of fixing DMC story - they decided to make a reboot in other words milk the series. If you find that acceptable then imagine a scenario of Capcom making two more "DMC" universes along with the current two. 1) called dmC 2) dMc. And then there would be total of one DMC game and 3 "DMC" games and the 3 "DMC" (the reboots) games share DMC as template (source of idea, gameplay , character). Would that be ok? No, and neither should one reboot be (especially one that's so different and not necessary).
The true fan thing is something i have cast away. But i believe that we are fan of something more than something else. Because that's how we are in general about interests, friends, idols, characters, series etc.
For example if you had to make a choice because a game company asked you "Do you want us to make sequel to Game A or Game B ?" (and person having to make a choice is fan of both game serie). You can't say both - then which would you choose? Whichever you choose it shows that people can be fans of something more than something else.
I have much more to say at a later date. Tomorrow morning, I shall return to continue this post. I have a lot of things left to say.
No, i say that Lara Croft in reboot looks amazing and much better than old Lara Craft because of graphical reasons. If they made a sequel to original Lara Croft games with nowdays technology then the character in reboot is very great to use. Because she looks like Lara Croft. They haven't changed her.I can't reply to all of your post, as I do not have the time today either -.-
Why move from 'old' Lara Croft? Because she isn't cool any more? I'm sorry but that to me is just silly. If you want to change the fell of the game-play to make it more survival styled. You don't need to redesign Lara Croft or go back to the beginning with it all. That to me is a ridiculous move, and a serious insult to those who have been fans since the very start, or for even a little while now.
But yet you're more okay with such a change from that, than you are from this. When as I said before, DmC is non canon to DMC. And it seems more likely that they will be continuing with the Devil May Cry series, because a ton of people still love the 'old' Dante. As I'm sure a lot of people still love the 'old' Lara Croft. So lets just hope they don't forget about them.
I have much more to say at a later date. Tomorrow morning, I shall return to continue this post. I have a lot of things left to say.