People who criticize the legal profession without knowing what the hell they are talking about. and I'm not talking "knowing that Phoenix Wright and CSI aren't accurate"
I'm talking actually looking into the sections and subsections of legal procedure. Like, as a volunteer office boy at the PD office, I have bare-bones knowledge of law, but keep in mind, when I read into those laws and subsections and procedures, I realized they pretty much try to tackle every possibility that could pertain to it. Each one goes to great lengths to make sure that the trial will be as in depth and detailed as possible, to make sure the 6th amendment stays in tact. Look into all these procedures and point out a flaw in whatever document to a congressman. If you feel the need to re open a closed case, then be damn sure to have the proper grounds. Because if you didn't like how a trial went, in no way is a lawyer obligated to go through the mountain of paperwork unless there is a proper grounds to say there was something overlooked.
And keep in mind, lawyers can't magically legal the way into things, you have to do paperwork, get case briefing, build up the case, do more paperwork, help select jury members, do paperwork, attend every part of the trial, do paperwork for each one, request motions, do some paperwork for those, do paperwork after the case gets closed
Did I mention the friggin paperwork!? And that's just criminal law, I haven't even looked into civil, and intellectual/property/business law all make my head hurt