@Chancy
Fair, but you've got to keep in mind that your attachment (or lack thereof) to the character is your own. From your sig it's revealing that you're a big fan of the Joker. If the Joker's hair, outfit, personality and gear were dramatically changed (for the reasons the DmC creators gave) could you honestly say you wouldn't be concerned or upset? I'm a massive Batman fan myself, and if core things I loved about the character were changed, I wouldn't find myself a happy man until it proves me wrong, and I'd be very harsh if it doesn't or isn't for the best benefit of the material.
You don't care, others do. A lot. That doesn't make them wrong as long as they're being constructive with their complaints and refraining from ugliness or personal attacks.
@EA9Sol
Thank you! =) That's actually a good point, and it's one I raised in the article referenced in this article (articleception). The objective analysis I link to. I recall speaking about the fact that too much was changed, leaving the franchise unrecognisable to its predecessors, breaking the familiarity and spirit of the series, which was very dangerous, as fans need constants (things that remain the same to help keep the material spiritually the same) and DmC effectively had none.
@SugarMoon
Me either, that's why the article I wrote was a bit harsher or direct in tone than I would have liked, as I was pretty riled at the time of writing it. It was hard to believe that a journalist, who should know better, would defend a game/publisher/developer to the extent that they'd actually show contempt for consumers for not buying a product. Scary, it's bordering on propaganda.