Wish some reboot fans stopped being such hypocrits. They claim they are fan of dmc or Dante, on other hand they dont mind a inferior version of dmc gameplay and a attempt at replacing Dante with a reboot character.
What kind of Dante fan would want to see the character rebooted? Why not build on the character, and make it better, instead of saying "Nope, lets throw this guy into garbage and make a new one".
IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE!
And when these people defend reboot, they say "It has potential", which is a overstatement. The reason reboot has potential is because it's based on dmc3/1/4 gameplay. Look at Enslaved or Heavenly sword that NT made by themself, does it have as potential as reboot does?
So its obvious to me why reboot is better than NT's past games, because it's a gameplay that was made by capcom. Made as in...they invented it. And inventing takes alot of work, more than reboot fans would give credit to it.
Take MGR for example, Hideki Kojima's team didn't know how to implement the gameplay. They were really stucked on, and thats when Hideki Kojima got PG involved.
It shows you that making a new gameplay, which will be foundation for a serie, is not a easy task.
reboot's gameplay is not new, and when people say "it has potential" its a overstatement of it's real potential.
I gurantee you, if NT was tasked to make a new gameplay that was remotely similar to dmc gameplay...there would been so many more issues than you currently see in DmC.
Finally we get to my point, if reboot has potential (as i pointed out, not alot)...then doesn't dmc (original serie) do? So why say "Reboot has potential lets go with reboot" when the original does too?
P.S capcom pitched in with the gameplay. It wasn't a one man doing the job, it was two.