So... this is basically a video hating on people who hate certain games. Alright, so according to you, hating a game is wrong, but hating the people who hate it is justified? O...kaay.
What is that video even about? It's about a person who apparently hates that people have opinions. Anger is not by definition a bad thing; it powerfully shows people what is good or acceptable and what is not. You can't preemptively stop people from flaming. Most of the time, the cause of the flaming isn't even the flamers themselves, it's the people who don't review things honestly. The video mentioned ME3. Didn't like it. It had almost no replayability, hardly any RPG elements, and for some reason the overall writing quality appeared to have deteriorated. It was decent, but was it worth a 9.5/10? Heeellll no. Hence the reason for the anger.
3:31 ''many people genuinely loved Mass Effect 3, and you're gonna have to get over that''. Well, how many people loved ME3 is irrelevant. Just because other people liked the game, that doesn't mean you should too. I think that is the true juvenile position that guy should rant about. I know some reactions to (reviews of) products are purely hateful, but they often stem from other people's valid criticism of them. Basically, haters don't take the time to criticize, so they use a more troglodytic way to express criticism, namely bashing.
3:35: ''It didn't affect your life in a tangible way''. Hold on. So ME3 being worse than ME1 and ME2 to many people didn't actually affect their lives? 1. They bought the game for like 60 dollars. 2. They spent a big chunk of their time playing it, wanting to get a good ending to the overall story, only to find out it wasn't that good. 3. It's taken about three years out of their life because they were waiting for that game. So... it doesn't destroy their lives, but it certainly ****es people off and makes them wish another game had been made.
Around 5:25, he does have a good point. However, I personally can't stand it when mediocre things are reviewed as being worth 9/10s. I don't want to (and can't) stop people from giving scores so high, but I think we have the right to show our opinion about it. Especially when it's posted online with a comments section specifically made to gauge the public's reaction, as well as its intensity. Don't want the reaction, then don't put a comments section underneath. Games being 'enjoyable' is not enough to make them amazingly awesome.
I understand his points. With DmC, it was pretty much the same. But you also must realize that DmC does some things better than previous DMCs, but most people agree it's not as good - and to think DmC might replace DMC!
''It doesn't affect your lives''? It does. Video games have been an important part of all my recreational time. They're part of my life. The more people praise mediocre games, the less effort developers will put into making great games. After all, their thinking is that 'mediocre is good enough'.
And the problem is not that 'not all games can be great' like he argues in the last minute or so, it's that there are fewer and fewer great games by the day. At this moment, the only game on my wishlist is The Evil Within. ONE game. That's how appealing games are getting. People are still waiting for the PS4 to finally get games worth playing, but it might take another two years or so before there's finally a reasonable amount of great games. I already looked at this year's PS4 titles list. Nothing special.
I wonder what is the point of this thread. It's not to make people aware of the inordinate amount of useless hate towards certain games, since we already were aware of that. It seems to me that you're doing the same thing as the haters. While the haters scream 'don't like what I hate', you're screaming 'don't hate what I like'. Those two things are equally bad.