That... really has no bearing.
He is an adult with responsibilities and life experience. The baring is that juvenile behaviour from a grown man is unbecoming and regressive. Rather than a man with age and responsibilities he is coming off as some angry adolescent who is yelling at his dad over some other wah wah, 'I wish you weren't my dad' or 'I hate you' or 'you f****** ass****.'
My dad is an adult man who raises a child and lives with his wife. Responsible and a great worker, and he still randomly curses like a sailor every 5 words or so.
That's quite different, isn't it. If he'd get into an accident or someone tried to punch him he'd surely have a strong reaction but he sure as hell wouldn't stand back, raise his middle finger up in the air and scream 'F*** ***' to the other person, right?
The kind of person profile you tried to give there isn't necessarily defined by swearing, or lack thereof rather.
It's not the swearing, it's the general behaviour and use of said swearing. I thought I made that clear when I pointed out Tarantino and Ritchie. This was the exact argument people had when they were defending DmC's and I have the same position here as I did there. It's not the f-bombs or the general swearing, it's the childish way it's done. This isn't some dude who says f*** with every single sentence because it's a mannerism, this is a man being extra loud with every profanity and while in DmC it's like 10 year old who just discovered the word here it's a 13 year old who just found out his dad is having an affair and is screaming profanities at the top of their lungs because he can't use his words.
I don't applaude it, as you put it, but I'm not really bothered by it either.
I don't remember saying you, specifically. I said it
is applauded not
you applaud it. If I did, thought, that was not my intention.
It is meant to be cheesy and silly
Those are two very different and negating tones, cheesy/silly and self righteously anger. I don't agree, that this was an intentional effect, I think they took it seriously but it came off cheesy and tremendously immature. I understand Nero's motivation for being there, to keep his family alive, but then he actually starts talking to Virgil and after one or two actual lines of dialogue he deteriorates to name calling and angry swearing.
If it doesn't to you, or you don't see one in the first place, then I've nothing else to say aside from starting repeating myself, and more power to you.
It's not so much a matter of there being a difference or that it matters. It's the fact that both are cringy but DMC gets a pass and DmC has it as a form of evidence for its lack of writing quality. There being a set up, though I disagree, doesn't change the fact that they are still screaming 'f*** ***' and that it not only is not working but strikes me as a double standard.
Kinda gone off topic anyway. :hungover:
I could always change it to 'Jackpot and F*** *** Overused?'