scionicspectre
Well-known Member
Yeah, it's definitely not as fun, anymore. I keep wondering how I was so into it. It's not bad, at all, but it gets old quick.
I would disagree, I found Nero to be much more fun to play with than Dante. Yeah Dante had a wider move list despite being the secondary character, a choice by Capcom that make 0 sense but Nero was really fun and easier to control, he felt more balanced and jumping into Dante after playing half the game with Nero was very Jarring, another choice by Capcom that makes no sense. I can say that I also had the same problem playing DMC4 again after this game. I hated having to lock on to enemies all the time in order to use a lot of my attacks, was annoyed by how slow and sluggish Dante and Nero moved. It's weird because on a nuts and bolts level DMC4 is faster than DmC and more fluid in some ways.It doesn't pick up until you play as Dante.
Nero just doesn't feel right.
But, the game gets so much fun once you take control of Dante.
After I've invested about 50 hours into the new DmC, I've started up DMC 4 after a long time and I was really surprised.
I thought that I'll jump right into the action but apparently I was wrong.
Everything just feels...clumsy or dated? I don't know. But it was harder to get into it.
I can't understand how some people can claim that the combat system is simplified. They obviously haven't played DmC, or they forgot (like me) how the combat in older DMCs actually is.
I made a little comparison:
Main character of DMC4 - Nero (Since you start with him and play around 60% of the game or more he is the main character, not Dante)
Is it so wrong to prefer one game over the other?:/
you do realise what you just said? stomping on a persons OPINION because you don't agree with THEIR REASON. that my friend is s "bullshit reason" to stomp an OPINION.
... feel of DmC are just so new compared to the other games it feels more comfortable.
A person can like whatever game they want for what ever reason, it's their money and no one has the right to demand that they'd like or dislike something against their will.Not for bullshit reasons it's not and i have every right to call anybody out on praising DmC for doing something that the DMC games apparently don't do when they've been doing it SINCE THE FIRST GAME.
:/...
Otherwise, you have no right to judge the new system, because you are simply not good enough.
they never attacked off screen because that's a cheap way to lose your rankI'd like to know what this game does better than the other games tbh, well more specifically 3 and 4.
Whenever I bring up enemies not attacking you off screen the question always seems to get dodged.
A person can like whatever game they want for what ever reason, it's their money and no one has the right to demand that they'd like or dislike something against their will.
We also have the right to dissagree however we want and argue our points. The strongerst arguements, by the way, are the ones that are backed up by facts and the weak ones are all opinion.
So, yes, you can call anyone out on their bullshit but they can like whatever they want.
THEY ARE DIFFERENT GAMES. When I play DMC4 or earlier titles now, my mind automatically switches to the old button configuration. When I play DmC I switch to the new one. Simple as that. Its like playing Halo and then playing DmC or something, and using the respective button schemes when switching games. I feel that most people on this forum are not good enough at either game to judge them properly. I have gotten every achievement for DMC4 (not exactly an easy feat), 970/1000 for DMC HD (i couldn't bring myself to beat DMC2 bloody palace... such a horrible game...), and rank 13th on the DmC bloody palace, and I still don't think I am good enough to compare these games properly (love every one of them though, also my GT is MasterBlasterAA if you want to check).
If you are this guy, or play DMC4 like this guy, you have a right to hate DmC (and he vehemently hates DmC, justifiably so). He clearly put a ton of time into learning the nuances of DMC4's combat system, and switching to a new one after being that good would be pretty jarring.
Otherwise, you have no right to judge the new system, because you are simply not good enough.
:/
I have no right to judge the new system? I can't agree with that at all...
My opinion of Dante in DMC4 is that he's overly complicated, and he plays no better than DMC3's Dante... as more of a casual player, I can judge the new system as far as complexity goes since it really affects my experience in the game.
As far as depth goes, I can't say anything since I never scraped the surface of DMC4's combat... is that what you meant? Because for me the new system is superior to DMC3/4 due to simplification.