I accept the medium(s) that the Devil May Cry story creators supportIts cool. Its in murky water as it is possible to accept both the manga and the novel if you fanwave hard enough.
Innocent humans don´t block other people´s passage and proclaim a location as theirs. Neither do innocent humans tell you to leave behind your katana because they want it.He killed innocent humans directly.Click for a larger image.
*sings* But he didn't have to cut them up....Innocent humans don´t block other people´s passage and proclaim a location as theirs. Neither do innocent humans tell you to leave behind your katana because they want it.
So it's okay to slaughter helpless gangsters on hunches? Killing people is evil. Killing people, that are so far below you on the food-chain is just plain slaughter.Furthermore - you need to know those rebels background before you can say if Vergil is truly evil or if the rebels are innocent.
Kamiya went off board after DMC1, after that, the crew was mainly the same, from what I heard. Hell, DMC3 and 4 were the same game with polished graphics, even though the team working on it was the same.Why do you think Devil May Cry storyline went off the track? Because they had no more ideas? No, because the vital developers left the train.
And i said DMC 1 story creator(s), if there was one man behind story, and the man was Hideki Kamiya, then yeah.I do not know the law in your country, but seriously?
*sings* But he didn't have to cut them up....
Do you kill the neighbours kid for playing with your ball without asking? If some thug brutalizes you, you either fight back (which Vergil didn't do, he killed them before they had the chance) and kick his ass or you survive and take it to the police, like any honest citizen would do. You don't walk around in a Katana, cutting down anyone who's delaying you by a few minutes.
So the rebels are kids playing with someone else's ball? Nice comparison.
So it's okay to slaughter helpless gangsters on hunches? Killing people is evil. Killing people, that are so far below you on the food-chain is just plain slaughter.
It´s slaughter indeed, but it does´t make Vergil evil. Those rebels you call "people" because people is nicer word for them probably have killed someone below their food-chain.
Kamiya went off board after DMC1, after that, the crew was mainly the same, from what I heard. Hell, DMC3 and 4 were the same game with polished graphics, even though the team working on it was the same.
DMC 2,3 and 4 Story are crap compared to DMC 1. DMC 1 made the foundation. DMC 2 was a alternative story, DMC 3 was a alternative take of how Vergil got controlled by Mundus and DMC 4 was another alternative story.
None of the DMC games after 1 took the story to next level.
DMC 2 was a off topic story
DMC 3 was repeating DMC 1 (fair attempt but didn´t elevate the story)
DMC 4 another off topic story that came out of nowhere.
I accept the medium(s) that the Devil May Cry story creators support
Innocent humans don´t block other people´s passage and proclaim a location as theirs. Neither do innocent humans tell you to leave behind your katana because they want it.
Furthermore - you need to know those rebels background before you can say if Vergil is truly evil or if the rebels are innocent.
For all we could know the rebels may been murderers...
And if Devil May Cry creator(s) haven´t supported the manga, then it´s just a alternative story about alternative Vergil just like DmC is a alternative story made by NT about a Dante.
Why do you think Devil May Cry storyline went off the track? Because they had no more ideas? No, because the vital developers left the train.
No. It's about moral standards. Killing is evil, therefore killers are evil. No thinking outside the box necessary, no need for justification. You end a life full of stories and relationships. You take possibilities out of the tapestry.Vergil is not a villain, nor good guy, nor anti hero.
It is nice to see everypony is thinking inside the box.
Think for a moment.
It's all about motives.
So, let's say I, with my twisted feeling of being the best at everything decide to kill people, because they step on my toes in dancing class. Pathetic losers, stepping on my feet while I am gracefully swirling through the ballroom.Vergil only really kills people if they get in his way. He thinks humans pathetic and not worth his time, but they beg to differ,and get in the way of his goals.
So we can't go saying Vergil is some "Katana wielding psycho".
Indeed.The mysterious figure who's true intentions will never be revealed. We know he wants power. We just don't know why
In relation to Vergil's sheer physical power and demonic abilities? They are probably less than ants to him. Ants with no legs. Blind ants, with their antenae torn off and already bleeding out.So the rebels are kids playing with someone else's ball? Nice comparison..
That's what we have law enforcement for, right? We're not to judge people. Vigilantism is always turning out badly, but that's not the point.It´s slaughter indeed, but it does´t make Vergil evil. Those rebels you call "people" because people is nicer word for them probably have killed someone below their food-chain.
Yes, but you forget, to Vergil, killing a human is pretty much stepping on a cockroach. To him it is not murder.No. It's about moral standards. Killing is evil, therefore killers are evil. No thinking outside the box necessary, no need for justification. You end a life full of stories and relationships. You take possibilities out of the tapestry.
Killing people is evil. Self-defense is not. Vergil was in no danger whatsoever, therefore he is evil.
I'm not trying to say, that my moral standards are any better than those of others, but seriously: Murder, manslaughter and the butchering of the helpless is generally frowned upon.
So, let's say I, with my twisted feeling of being the best at everything decide to kill people, because they step on my toes in dancing class. Pathetic losers, stepping on my feet while I am gracefully swirling through the ballroom.
That would make me a psycho, right?
Now, to relate that to Vergil's situation: He walks down an alley, half-god that he is and those puny little humans, with their cute baseball-bats come at him. He could easily dispatch them without killing them, but instead he chose to cut them into tiny pieces.
But the DMC creator did leave after DMC 1. And he's one of the major key players in story of DMC.To answer both questions, Devil May Cry's storyline went off track since no-one knew where to take it or all parties wanted to go in different directions. They couldnt work together.
But the DMC creator did leave after DMC 1. And he's one of the major key players in story of DMC.
I said that because i don't know if he's responsible for whole story or not.you said it yourself he is ONE of the major players not THE. now folks how did we go from looks to personalility in a few topics? what happend to my thread?View attachment 191
We just don't know why