• Welcome to the Devil May Cry Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Devil May Cry series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

Due to DmC's bad sales......

Good reviews don't mean much when Call of Duty gets consistent high 90's for recycling the same game on a yearly basis

Ninja Theory ends up losing money or barely breaking even on every single game they make. They haven't earned the right to be smug because they barely have an audience they can afford to alienate in the first place

COD is more than decent and compared to most other games has a lot more content even without admittedly overpriced DLC.

Biggest bang for buck this generation bar games like fallout 3, skyrim, gta 4 etc.
 
The problem being that they re release the same decent game on a yearly basis. The same business practice Activision used to drive Guitar Hero from Next Big Thing to dead genre
 
  • Like
Reactions: V
The problem being that they re release the same decent game on a yearly basis. The same business practice Activision used to drive Guitar Hero from Next Big Thing to dead genre

They're different enough with IW's and 3arc's different spins on multiplayer.

Comparable to the SFII version's minute differences which can change the whole game.
 
Why'd you have to insult me again? I didn't even say anything to you this time.
You were more than happy to jump on my back in the first place. So now I don't give a rat's ass if I do or not. Neither of you were respectful, no use complaining now.
 
You were more than happy to jump on my back in the first place. So now I don't give a rat's ass if I do or not. Neither of you were respectful, no use complaining now.

You responded to my post aggressively first. I wasn't even talking to you when you jumped in. You drew first blood, not me.
 
You responded to my post aggressively first. I wasn't even talking to you when you jumped in. You drew first blood, not me.
If you mean this:

"Well no, you don't have to be professional if you are not a professional trying to sell someone a product or a service. The onus is not on the customer to convince or gain trust, is it."

That's not being aggressive or 'drawing blood' or getting personal with you. It's called replying to a post. And discussing the subject at hand.

But this:

Convenient. -_-

I'm sure you have a plethora of excuses up your sleeve.

Doesn't even pertain to the subject properly, and is nothing more than a weak snark at me.

So yeah. If you're gonna act like that with me, this is what you are going to get.
 
You said that customers don't have to be professional only to prove that you're right.

I was only saying that while they don't have to be entirely professional, they can't go around insulting a store's products either.

I then explained how a trade between client and provider must be met halfway, and left it at that.

You then took a parting shot at me, and then said you didn't care.
 
You said that customers don't have to be professional only to prove that you're right.

I was only saying that while they don't have to be entirely professional, they can't go around insulting a store's products either.

I then explained how a trade between client and provider must be met halfway, and left it at that.

You then took a parting shot at me, and then said you didn't care.
You were 'only' saying some pretty personal things aimed at me as well. If you'd kept it clean, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
 
Well you are wrong, because it wasn't just a reply, it's a fact.

You admit to it being an insult, then.

So, customers are allowed to insult a store's products if they want to and it's a fact?

No. No isn't a fact. And it's wrong to insult a store. And you can't just say that I'm wrong and then say that's the end of it.
 
You admit to it being an insult then.
No. I admit to it being a reply to a post about the topic. And also a fact. Go out and work for a company that deals with the public and tell me that you are not required to uphold a public image.

So, customers are allowed to insult a store's products if they want to and it's a fact?
No. I never said that ever. I said the onus is on companies to gain customers' trust and uphold an expected professional standard that customers are not expected to because they are customers, not professionals. That is the 'professional standard' I'm talking about, not public decency.

No. No isn't a fact. And it's wrong to insult a store. And you can't just say that I'm wrong and say that's the end of it.
And I never claimed any of that so you are obviously having a different discussion in your head to the one I'm having on this board.
 
Back
Top Bottom