V
Oldschool DMC fan
more than half of those aren't from me -_-
Some examples for you, nothing more.
more than half of those aren't from me -_-
Good reviews don't mean much when Call of Duty gets consistent high 90's for recycling the same game on a yearly basis
Ninja Theory ends up losing money or barely breaking even on every single game they make. They haven't earned the right to be smug because they barely have an audience they can afford to alienate in the first place
The problem being that they re release the same decent game on a yearly basis. The same business practice Activision used to drive Guitar Hero from Next Big Thing to dead genre
and when they die we will all be happy so lets drop call of duty discussion on a dmc websiteThe problem being that they re release the same decent game on a yearly basis. The same business practice Activision used to drive Guitar Hero from Next Big Thing to dead genre
Some examples for you, nothing more.
You were more than happy to jump on my back in the first place. So now I don't give a rat's ass if I do or not. Neither of you were respectful, no use complaining now.Why'd you have to insult me again? I didn't even say anything to you this time.
You were more than happy to jump on my back in the first place. So now I don't give a rat's ass if I do or not. Neither of you were respectful, no use complaining now.
If you mean this:You responded to my post aggressively first. I wasn't even talking to you when you jumped in. You drew first blood, not me.
Convenient. -_-
I'm sure you have a plethora of excuses up your sleeve.
which is basically what NT and capcom said, zingIf you mean this:
So yeah. If you're gonna act like that with me, this is what you are going to get.
I thought you'd say that. But since you've been arguing it's okay to play eye for an eye and screw professionalism, I'll play your game.which is basically what NT and capcom said, zing
You were 'only' saying some pretty personal things aimed at me as well. If you'd kept it clean, we wouldn't be having this conversation.You said that customers don't have to be professional only to prove that you're right.
I was only saying that while they don't have to be entirely professional, they can't go around insulting a store's products either.
I then explained how a trade between client and provider must be met halfway, and left it at that.
You then took a parting shot at me, and then said you didn't care.
Well you are wrong, because it wasn't just a reply, it's a fact.I still say that first post was a back-handed insult meant to look like I was wrong.
Well you are wrong, because it wasn't just a reply, it's a fact.
700,000 sales is a failure when they have a few months left to make sales? great logic, "oh it didn't make as much as dmc4 initially, but got better reception, FAIL" -_-That worked out pretty well for them judging by the colossal failure of this awful game (`~`)
zing
No. I admit to it being a reply to a post about the topic. And also a fact. Go out and work for a company that deals with the public and tell me that you are not required to uphold a public image.You admit to it being an insult then.
No. I never said that ever. I said the onus is on companies to gain customers' trust and uphold an expected professional standard that customers are not expected to because they are customers, not professionals. That is the 'professional standard' I'm talking about, not public decency.So, customers are allowed to insult a store's products if they want to and it's a fact?
And I never claimed any of that so you are obviously having a different discussion in your head to the one I'm having on this board.No. No isn't a fact. And it's wrong to insult a store. And you can't just say that I'm wrong and say that's the end of it.