No its not because P* suck when it comes to story, and their gameplay have nothing close to DMC, so f*ck that horrible idea.
DmC: Devil May Cry vs. Devil May Cry... (keep it civil, or else).
- Thread starter I Make The Devils Cry
- Start date
- Status
No its not because P* suck when it comes to story, and their gameplay have nothing close to DMC, so f*ck that horrible idea.
I didn't mean that as an insult, I just meant that what I think is logical is not as important as other people's views. You said the difficulty curve isn't as steep as in DMC. I misinterpreted that. Sorry for the mix-up. I'm glad you explained in more detail, though.
Then I must be the wrongest person on the face of the Earth. F*ck it, call me good loser Kumagawa for being so wrong.
Nah, just on this forum. :troll:
Thank you for showing a little humility.
TWOxACROSS
Hot-blooded God of Guns
What standard of sold "well" and sold "poor" are you even using? Because DmC, while it didn't break a gajillion units, the standard of selling over a million is considered pretty damn good.
And our opinion is shared by many other people as well. You have no way of cleanly saying "vast majority" because unless we decided to take a headcount, we're never gonna know. So quit throwing around that blanket number to make your opinion sound stronger than it is :/
They did not dramatically sell better, the last great DMC for me which I would consider DMC3 sold about 1.2 million copies, so arguably the best DMC combat wise sold about as well as DmC has so far. And you don't have prove to be able to say, the vast majority of DMC fans. I just find it difficult to swallow that actual DMC fans who played DmC and gave the gameplay a real chance would be like "nah, they ruined it, this game isn't DMC," because honestly it still has a really deep combat system, which is unlike anything else on the market.
DragonMaster2010
Don't Let the Fall of America be Your Fall
Then I must be the wrongest person on the face of the Earth. F*ck it, call me good loser Kumagawa for being so wrong.
Don't insult yourself like that!:lol:
That doesn't really have anything to do with what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that my opinion of Classic DMC being better than DmC is a majority opinion. It's a majority opinion due to the fact of sales numbers.
DMC1, 2, 3, and 4 all sold well, and they each sold better than DmC.
Therefore, the majority of fans agree that Classic DMC is way better than DmC. Add in the fact that the HD remakes sold well.
As a result, rebooting the franchise was a rather foolish decision.
Here we go. Now that your original argument has been... utterly destroyed, you just brush it off and use the, "that has nothing to do with this," tactic.
That's not gonna fly here, buddy.
I'm not sure you can actually say that because the old ones sold better, people found the old ones ''way better than DmC''. That doesn't make any sense. Sales are sales, and guess what? A lot of people actually refrained from buying DmC because they were afraid of change, or simply because they didn't feel like buying a Devil May Cry game or H&S game again.
Ok then.
Godhand Naruto dafkjndafna;pjiv has officially won. At everything. Ever. The End.
Welcome to the Dark Side.
First, saleswise DMC3 sold about 1.2 million... so DmC will probably soon surpass it in sales.
Again, you're operating under the assumption that classic DMC style sequel would have sold any better without any proof to back that up. I'd say the genre as a whole is suffering, which is quite sad, because unless you're God of War, good luck breaking 2 million units sold in the first few months. Also, You keep talking about accessible, but if they don't find a way to make them more accessible, the genre itself will die, because these games are expensive, you can't have the indie nostalgic kickstarter version of a DMC game. That's why you never see that many Kickstarters for action games like DMC, MGR, or DmC.
Again, you're operating under the assumption that classic DMC style sequel would have sold any better without any proof to back that up. I'd say the genre as a whole is suffering, which is quite sad, because unless you're God of War, good luck breaking 2 million units sold in the first few months. Also, You keep talking about accessible, but if they don't find a way to make them more accessible, the genre itself will die, because these games are expensive, you can't have the indie nostalgic kickstarter version of a DMC game. That's why you never see that many Kickstarters for action games like DMC, MGR, or DmC.
Alright, but could you clarify? I mean, I can understand that many people would not want to buy a Devil May Cry game again, after DMC4 (though I did like DMC4). Aside from that... maybe the H&S genre wasn't that popular anymore?
Devil May Cry 2.99[3]
Devil May Cry 2 1.97 [4]
Devil May Cry 3 1.3± [2] (4.3)†‡[5]
Devil May Cry 4 2.78‡[6]
DmC: Devil May Cry§ 1.1[2]‡ (0.79)‡[7]
http://devilmaycry.wikia.com/wiki/Devil_May_Cry_(series)
All the previous games sold better than the remake, and that's because the majority of us think that Classic DMC is simply better than DmC.
You can try ignoring this all you want, but no future DmC game will do as well as previous versions. So, Capcom should just give up on the reboot, lose NT, and give the series to devs who understand solid gameplay(best choice is Platinum games).
Can't there be a cheap 2D action platformer that plays like MvC3? Is it really that expensive, even on a 2D scale?
- Status