THIS IS SO OFF-TOPIC
THIS IS SO OFF-TOPIC
Pure badassery right there.
BLAHGJDMDGFFXF
.
I know that he's not the ultimate warrior but, we're talking about Deadpool and Dante. Deadpool wins. Got it? Good.
Didn't Batman beat Deadpool though? :troll:I know that he's not the ultimate warrior but, we're talking about Deadpool and Dante. Deadpool wins. Got it? Good.
I don't get Marvel Comics. Hurr durr rant. I don't know the Squirrel Girl joke.
The internet has this stupid Batman "logic" that Batman wins because he's Batman. I like that video because it's pretty cool but would Batman really win? Probably not. Batman can get owned by lots of heroes in a straight up fight. Comic book writers throw him lots of bones because why is the only human in the JLA who's basically walking amongst gods really so superior?Didn't Batman beat Deadpool though? :troll:
If you think Batman can defeat Superman you deserve a f#cking hard slap in the face.
Oh, absolutely.Love that show. It still stands though.
Batman even flat admits Superman can crush him in to the pavement if he wanted to.
I just wanna say your sig and profile pic is cool and is indication that I most likely like your taste in films good sir. I feel like watching Hard Boiled.Glad we got all that cleared up...
I just wanna say your sig and profile pic is cool and is indication that I most likely like your taste in films good sir. I feel like watching Hard Boiled.
Alucard probably wins, but i dont think it's fair comparison to compare Alucard and Dante.
According to this page, Alucard is over 580 years old.
How old is Dante in DMC 2? 30? 40? I dont think hes older than 35 in DMC 2.
So a character who has existed 35 years vs a character that has existed 580 years.
How strong will Dante be when he's 580 years - if he do nto die because of his demonic blood?
If you want a serious battle then you should take it into consideration when comparing two characters.Age doesn't matter in a fanfiction battle. Ever.
If you want a serious battle then you should take it into consideration when comparing two characters.
If age didn´t matter, then you could compare Dante when he was 10 years old with Alucard (present). But it does matter, and i think if Dante is immortal, after 500+ years he will be much stronger than he is currently.
When possible i think its best to compare two characters at the age of the character with least existence.
e.g Dante is around 35 years, while Alu is 580 years.
Then compare Alu when he was 35 years with Dante.
That is...if circumstances allow for such comparison.
Such comparison will be far more accurate than a comparison of 35 old character vs 580 years old one.
My argument is invalid because Dante has more impressive feats than Alu at age of 35 than Alu whos 580 years?And yet Dante was able have shown more impressive feats in terms of Power, Speed, Reaction/Reflex time, Destructive Capability and able to kill concepts by just being 35 years old therefore your argument is invalid. Alucard got Dante beat in terms of regeneration and durability(Millions of Souls hax) and that's it.
If this is Omnipresence Alucard then sure Dante is f*cked.