Ok.Yeah, nostalgia is profitable and people remember the early power rangers pretty fondly. You'll find less excitement for Megaforce and Ninja steel from that same audience unless they're Tokusatsu fans however.
So then, "find tokusatsu fans and interact with those guys for a more fulfilling experience being a fan of Power Rangers".
No, I followed exactly where it lead, and you lost the plot by using that as a comparison and not something equally harmless but also just a product on sale. American society doesn't generally hold pornographic content as having high cultural prevalence or value or something people admit to in public to begin with; have you SEEN the US's attitudes towards sex, kink, and general nudity compared to violence? It's practically a meme how Puritanical the general US is about it. It ends up a topic of discourse anytime it's brought up (see: outrage over big blue dong in Watchmen). I kept it kid-friendly, you went someplace else.You're running too far with this my guy, I put Walmart because that's literally where that photo was from and that price. It could have been from anywhere and I would've said the same thing. Posting a picture of a man contractually paid to wear a shirt for a photo shoot doesn't validate or invalidate the perception or identity of the image, brand or idea, or if he even personally likes or endorses what he's wearing, simple as that. I chose something from the opposite spectrum to illustrate the same point; posting a photo of something sexually oriented on domestic or international sale doesn't speak towards the cultural prelevance, value, or perception of that brand, image or idea. It's simply a thing on sale.
I don't know why we're still on this conversation and we really shouldn't be because there's nothing more to talk about. I've already made my point.
Have a good one.