Creepy guy sliding into my DMs or bot, who can say? Either way, Wattpad is one of the weirdest places for this to occur.
...And sadly this isn't the first time. >.>
...And sadly this isn't the first time. >.>
I randomly picture all kinds of stuff in my head and smile like an idiot. People think I'm crazy.So am I the only one who randomly pictures Vergil's EX taunt in my head and smiles like a idiot? I am? Well... You guys are no fun at all.
Suicide SquadSo I saw the 1st Wonder Woman. (Very late to the game, leave me be!) The 1st half was great. Diana is a sweetheart and I want to hug her. The 2nd half is where the film falls.
Seriously he was the bad guy?! Like, why? So Suicide Squad Extended Cut or Aquaman folks? Cast your vote and make me suffer!
WandaVision is quite possibly going to be a new favourite of mine. I know it's only been two episodes but I am very, very intrigued...
Its on Disney + and its the same actress from the movies.Is it on any streaming services? I loved Wanda's character. Is she played by the same actress from the MCU, btw?
CT: I'm far more tired than I should be, considering I haven't been pushing myself too hard the last couple of months.
To add to @V's patron's answer, it has Paul Bettany too and I am loving the completely different style it has going on right now. Me and Steve spent both episodes just going, "what??" But in a good way. There are so many little touches that happen in the background too...it's completely unexpected so far.Is it on any streaming services? I loved Wanda's character. Is she played by the same actress from the MCU, btw?
CT: I'm far more tired than I should be, considering I haven't been pushing myself too hard the last couple of months.
I had severe troubles with this when I was a child, even though I was pretty good at school. Math was the only subject where I ever needed after-school-assistance from the teacher.This is where I fall down when it comes to maths: I have slight dyscalculia anyway, but I really struggle with basic mathematical concepts.
I can understand that 0x4=0 because you have zero to start with. You can't multiply nothing. But when the whole thing is flipped and the sum is 4x0, I can't process it. At all. Because, to me, you have 4 of something to start with, so you must still have that at the end. If I have 4 cakes and I multiply them by nothing, I still have 4 cakes - not zero. The cakes haven't vanished.
It honestly makes no sense to me at all.
The existing wording actually really helps here - it makes the whole calculation make more sense to me. Maths is a very difficult subject for me and I had two tutors during my last 2 years of high school (over here they're our GCSE exam years and it is now a requirement to obtain maths and English in order to progress in education and, usually, employment).I had severe troubles with this when I was a child, even though I was pretty good at school. Math was the only subject where I ever needed after-school-assistance from the teacher.
What helped me is thinking it this way:
You have 4 cakes lying on a table (1 table). If you multiply them by 2 (4x2), you have a set of four cakes on two tables (2 tables). Therefore, you have 8 table-lying-cakes in total. (4x2=8, or 4cakes_ON_2tables_IS_8tablecakes)
You have 4 cakes lying on a table. You have one table (1 table). Therefore, you have got a set of four cakes on one table. You have 4 table-lying-cakes in total.(4x1=4, or 4cakes_ON_1table_IS_4tablecakes)
You have 4 cakes. You don't have a table (0 tables). Therefore, you don't have ANY table-lying-cakes. (4x0=0, OR 4cakes_ON_not-even-a-single-table_IS_0tablecakes).
Or:
4 cakes existing once -> 4x1=4
4 cakes existing zero times -> 4x0=0
-> The cakes never existed. You've got zero cakes.
(If this made you sad, go buy some candy. You have my permission.)
The existing wording