Headcanon is not being passed on as fact. It is just an opinion alot of us agree with when it comes to Vergil.
It sure as hell sounds like it, when half the stuff that was being brought up was never put forth in the games >.> I got into a circular logic argument because Innsmouth was denying one element and trying to extrapolate reasoning for things that didn't exist.
The guy chose an honorable defeat, but got a dishonorable loss only to re-retrieve his honorable death. If that isn't some respectable **** then I don't know what is.
Ha. So even if Vergil was giving out honorable deaths (like he is), he still isn't honorable?
What actually constitutes an "honorable death" that can be given to someone?
And, I mean, Vergil is certainly about clean fights with no shenanigans, but that's less about any sort of respect and more about wanting to fight someone with their own potential. Like, that's why he thinks a gun is uncivilized, it makes killing easy, and doesn't require much of the wielder's potential to be shown.
And c'mon FO, don't be like that.
You have your opinion of what's honorable in a villain and I have my own.
Don't any of you forget that ****.
See, now that's gonna bug me, because it totally doesn't matter what your definition of a word is - the one that actually matters is the actual definition >.>