I made this thread to discuss something Meg brought to my attention.
A lot of the supporters aren't exactly being kind to skeptics. Whether you love or hate the game, we can all agree on this. People need to be tolerant of others opinion.
This thread will also serve as a safe haven for skeptics. It seems as if this forum will not allow people to show why they dislike the game. If you wish to voice your specific or general concern for the game, please do so here. No one will be allowed to condemn your opinion.
Rules:
- THIS THREAD IS INTENDED TO VOICE INDIVIDUAL OPINIONS OR CONCERNS FOR THE LATEST DEVIL MAY CRY.
- YOU CAN POST A CONCERN FOR THE GAME HERE
- FANS OR SUPPORTERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BASH OR REJECT SOMEONE'S SPECIFIC CONCERN IN THIS THREAD.
This is actually not a new thing. I made a thread kinda like this because the roles were reversed back then eg. the skeptics were hating on the game so much that the few (and I do mean FEW, there were like 3 or 4 of us at best at the time) who support DmC were made to feel like outcasts because we were the minority and the majority would have stoned us if we dared so much as say 'hey it actually looks ok'. Then there were the endless threads about 'true fans' and insults being thrown around, kids pushing other kids off the junglegyms and hogging the swings while sticking out their tongues. And the tantrums. MY WORD. The tantrums were Epic Events that you totally missed out on.
Which is why some of the older members are straying away from this here board. We've been there, been ignored, got the bruises to show for it, etc etc.
Anyway, why discriminate? I'm a full-on supporter, does that mean I can't come post my concerns for the game here just because I'm not a skeptic? Just wondering because "This thread will also serve as a safe haven for skeptics."
I'm feeling very unsafe right now
On Topic:
- I don't mind whether they put Vergil in or not anymore. I went through a stage where I was trying envision how they would reboot him, what his role would be, whether he'd still be Vergil or a totally 'new' character with Vergil's name. And then I decided to stop fussing over something I have no control over. If they put him into the game, cool. If they don't, even cooler. I'm easy to please when I let go of my expectations. Either way I doubt I'll be disappointed.
- Is it a good thing that they're making Dante a physical rebel? What I mean is, he's acting out like other teenagers would. He smoke(d?), he's violent and aggressive, he's got a super-potty-mouth, and he's got tattoos. Does he have piercings too? I dunno, if he does it's probably where that pizza crust was cos otherwise I didn't see any piercings. Sure it makes him more 'real' and relatable to teenagers today, but then you have to ask yourself where you draw the line. It's M-rated - cursing and nudity and all that adultish stuff is not bogus for M-rated material, but M is for 18+, right?
How many devil may cry fans are under 18?/ rhetorical
You see where I'm going with this, don't you?
- The angel thing. I still have an issue with the angel thing. Mythologically/logically/practically speaking, an angel wouldn't do it with a demon. In order for that to happen, the angel would have to fall from grace to act out on a fleshly desire. In other words, the 'angel' would actually be a demon. So.... it just boggles my mind. Who's the angel anyway? If Eva is called a 'b.ch' does that make her the angel or the demon? If it's an insult from a demon then we can assume she's an angel, but what if Sparda is actually the angel because he rebelled against the demons? Would that make Eva an angel then? Would they both be angels or demons? No, it can't be because then they wouldn't say Dante is half angel, would they? But....but...agh it's just... where is the line? If this is the effect NT is going for with their whole 'evil & good' thing, then well played Ninja Theory, well played.
I still think angels should be left where they belong and not brought into video games.