Zey
I came here to laugh at you.
Reported for thread escalation.
Reported for language and starting arguments.
You have been everything but civilized in regards to this thread. Reported.
Reported for thread escalation.
Reported for language and starting arguments.
You have been everything but civilized in regards to this thread. Reported.
I know I said I'd leave this thread but.. BURN!!!Be careful, you might wear out the report button.
...I think I should say in DmC Vergil's defence that Yamato had been given him by his father, and he kept it because, well, it's a powerful weapon, no matter how it looks.....That's why he focuses more on the design for his clothes and not for his sword,right? I would actually prefer someone who puts more elegance and price to its own weapon of killing rather than on how they look.
And how can a skilled warrior truly be skilled with his weapon if it isn't good enough for its type? The design and how good it is when slicing demons matters,especially the sharpness to the katana,because these are swords with style.
My opinion,though.
Don't participate in the flame war guys!
I just miss the good days of this forum
There were good days? Tell me of these magical times!:O
Chances are that was before the TGS 2010 reveal trailer.
Don't participate in the flame war guys!
I just miss the good days of this forum
I don't like it too, but i think it fits more DmC Vergil than classic Yamato would fit. He does not have that warrior mindset and attitude classic Vergil had and the classic Yamato seems like a sword that fits a warrior and not a modern "political" leader that's the son from some random demon that fell in love to an angel woman and betrayed his own kind, the context is very different: Dante and Vergil are sons from a well-known Legendary Dark Knight, makes sense to show their "strength" as warriors by making them use strong-looking weapons as a resemblance to their own father.
It comes to opinion in the end of the day, but the two different contexts will fit more or less some art designs. Personally i like more the "sons of the Legendary Dark Knight that saved the human world" that are portrayed as powerful warriors with distinct (and even oppose) mindsets than the "sons of a lieutenant demon that fell in love to an angel and was enslaved by the general demon" that are portrayed as average modern joes that find themselves thrown in a political context between demons and humans and plays more political than heroical roles.
You know, I personally like DmC's portrayal of this aspect in comparison to DMC's, mostly because in the originals Dante is always in his father's damned shadow, so he has little chance to carve out his own legacy, just being "the son of sparda." That and also I've grown to hate the "son of godly badass X" cliche; it's like it installs an instant path to greatness into them instead of earning it for themselves, or sometimes even betrays the idea that lessers can become greater than the legends (this was a blackmark against Kratos for me too. Guy was awesome enough without being the son of a god, and ultimately it brought very little to the table, "cycle of father and son" be damned.)
DmC's take on the otherhand has a lot of room for them to carve out their own destiny as the Sons of Sparda and Eva but also nephilim and themselves, while also having the parents potentially be pretty powerful in their own right but not thought of as near invincible like Sparda in the originals is almost alluded to at times. Afterall, Sparda was 2nd to Mr. frickin' Godmode before breaking away. That and I also find the whole sacrificing themselves to protect their children thing more relatable, while "Dark Knight and priestess saving the world" feels a comparably more nebulous, though some of that could be due to my own tragic headcanon of Eva beasting on hordes in a bloody mini-war while Sparda and the sons escape, and Sparda going down liek a BAWS for vengeance over his wife after hiding the children away.
Hmm... might turn this into an actual thread later, DMC Sparda vs DmC Sparda portrayals.
this is not a daycare centre and i am most certainly not interested in wiping any more snotty noses because someone says your firetruck looks dumb.
Threads like this are meant to compare and also for expressing everyone's personal taste and if not,to argue why.
That's why I will say my own opinion which is based on my personal choice.
It doesn't mean somebody wants to start a flame war just because one Yamato looks better than the other one.
If so,then ignoring it would be the best choice to do.
Yes, I should have used 'debate' better,I wrote it quickly..To discuss not argue would be a better way to put it, people can have a discussion & debate points without arguing.
the Reboot vergil's Yamato looks like he was trying to cut down trees with it(without the cutting dimensions)DMC3's yamato looked sharper. Because the hamon (tempered line) was more distinguished and gave that look of if you touch it lightly, it'll cut your hand off completely. And then the Boshi (final curve) was curved into a pretty sharp point.