Uuhhhh...sure...if that's what you wanna take away from everything. Go ahead.
To be really blunt, IncaDemo, you're defending MGR for being more than "in name only"
I think he means that MGR is more than "in name only" because it actually is in the same universe while DmC is pretty much ....I think, we all know.
TwoX, I seriously think she either doesn't listen to anything or seriously just doesn't understand. Demon's in her own little world.
Also MGR is technically canon to the Metal Gear series since they decided to make it take place after the events of MGS 4 in the future. Which is stupid because Raiden retired in MGS 4. He shouldn't be suiting up again. And he's been through a bunch of sh!t. Let the dude go back to his wife and kid.
You can tell Kojima hardly had any involvement with MGR.
Well aren´t you so cool.Uuhhhh...sure...if that's what you wanna take away from everything. Go ahead.
O_________________________________o
Really...? Because I remember it having been part of the canon as MGS:R, but once it was taken out of the timeline there and became MGR, it was just a "what-if" game like Ghost Babel was. Because originally it was supposed to be about Raiden saving Sunny from Area 51, but then when it became MGR, they scrapped the idea and went with the whole what-if scenario.
Well aren´t you so cool.
You're not being cool yourself
Tell me, why did you in first place, when you replied to me, not adress the content of my post rather talk about how ironic it is i am defending MGR when i have a difference stance on DmC-DMC.
If you wanted me and you to discuss the topic in a constructive way and end it knowing more about eachother´s thoughts and opinion...
u would have adressed what i said about MGR, not be a condescending troll "Ironic that IC says this about MGR, when DmC-DMC is same thing".
But u didnt.
So drop the act.
Have fun defending the mediocre game that barely innovated DMC gameplay, only thing it did is repeat same thing but in a crappier way with a new paint job.
That game...took 3 years...is having tough time facing DMC 4 and MGR , which both are games that were rushed. Something DmC wasnt.
If Capcom team or PG received 3 years to make DMC 5, they would make a game that would flush the bad taste of DmC´s gameplay out.
Oh and i am not a PG fanboy, i dont care if its Capcom or PG. Afterall if it wasnt for Capcom...DmC would been worse.
Well aren´t you so cool.
Tell me, why did you in first place, when you replied to me, not adress the content of my post rather talk about how ironic it is i am defending MGR when i have a difference stance on DmC-DMC.
If you wanted me and you to discuss the topic in a constructive way and end it knowing more about eachother´s thoughts and opinion...
u would have adressed what i said about MGR, not be a condescending troll "Ironic that IC says this about MGR, when DmC-DMC is same thing".
But u didnt.
So drop the act.
Have fun defending the mediocre game that barely innovated DMC gameplay, only thing it did is repeat same thing but in a crappier way with a new paint job.
That game...took 3 years...is having tough time facing DMC 4 and MGR , which both are games that were rushed. Something DmC wasnt.
If Capcom team or PG received 3 years to make DMC 5, they would make a game that would flush the bad taste of DmC´s gameplay out.
Oh and i am not a PG fanboy, i dont care if its Capcom or PG. Afterall if it wasnt for Capcom...DmC would been worse.
Yea, it takes place 4 years after Guns of The Patriots.
I heard when it was MGS:R it was going to take place in between 2 and 4 doing what you said but, I think I remember hearing it was P* and Konami who pushed for it being in the future so they wouldn't be restricted in that particular narrative.They wanted to do more of their own stuff. That's when I think Kojima just said f#ck it.
Actually, DmC was rushed. A lot of that three years was back and forth discussions between two countries, and the entire first year or so was plagued with changes in vision, where Capcom wanted more drastic changes to be made. Because of the collaborative nature of the game's development, an entire portion of the dev time (three years) had a lot of moments where not a whole lot of development was being done, because Capcom was looking over Ninja Theory's progress. Plus, there's all the time the dev team took out to create the multiple demos shown at conventions (and for the consoles), which actually do take away from regular dev time.
And yet, it was still better then DMC4 when I played it. Ain't that funny.
I know MGR took place after MGS4, and they did so to alleviate the restrictions from it being in the middle of the timeline when it was MGS:R, but I hadn't heard that it was still supposed to be canon. I had only heard that along with it being taken out of the middle of the timeline, it also became that "what-if" scenario, just for the sake of letting us play a cyborg ninja.
Maybe it was some news that popped up while I was knee deep in DmC's release >_< Are you sure it was s'posed to be canon?
The game still keeps the events of MGS 4 in tact. They even reference and hint of Snake's death. And him being dead within about 4 years isn't hard to believe. He didn't have long at all unfortunately.
It's not something like for example The Dark Knight Returns which even though taking place in the future it has always been non canon. They never state MGR is some alternate reality. The game never acts like it either.