Vergil actually has emotional and philosophical weight behind his decisions. He doesn't want power for the sake of power. There's actually a good reason for him wanting it, this time.
I don't think it can get worst than DmC Dante's reveal... wait... can it?Something tells me this is gonna be a flame war thread soon...Better get out of here before I get burned...:ermm:
That's my thinking. There would be no pressures of expectation and no outrage as a result, it could work on its own just as well as some current-age demon world and we wouldn't be constantly slipping back into comparing it with its predecessors.
But the lure of an existing IP's fanbase, and the fact "no publicity is bad publicity" is probably too great a pull for them to have done so.
The way it's been executed so far, as I've just been telling a fellow member here, feels like some long drawn-out torture. The reveals, fans' reaction, the creators' re-reactions, the ragelove, done over and over. It's become bizarre.
But the thing is that this is the next Devil May Cry, it was never intended to be an original IP,some people probably complained about MGS for PS1 because it was three dimensional, does that make it any less Metal Gear game?
Or Super Mario 2 because it's different from another 2D mario games?
Besides what difference does it make whether it belongs to the DMC series or not, If the game is good I will buy it, and you can always choose not to buy it...
I've said this so many times, that I'd've been more responsive if was based on DMC rather than a been retelling/reboot of it. Hell, even a spin off would've been less chaotic.
to be fair, Capcom doesnt really know what to do with DMC and they are looking for new ips so it could have been marketed similar to Asura's wrath.But it wouldn't be the same game anymore, besides why would Capcom want to copy themselves when they can make the real deal? :shifty:
With a spin off take the issue people would've had would've been when a DMC title was going to be released.not sure a spinoff would have worked because you run into similar problems people had with nero.
to be fair, Capcom doesnt really know what to do with DMC and they are looking for new ips so it could have been marketed similar to Asura's wrath.
but since its different, would it really be the same if NT handled both?
on topic- im ok with new vergil just more on the skeptical side.
OMG, i see everyone love new vergil....what happaned with the true DMC fans which suppose to dislike him ? :/
Why should you ? It was a 2 minute trailer, but never say never ( Damnit Justin Bieber for making this line sound so faggish >_< ) I used to hate this game and now I'm all over it... :OI'm not falling all over myself for this new 'Vergil'.
I'm not falling all over myself for this new 'Vergil'.
If I may ask, what was your vision for Vergil in this game? If you created Vergil for this game what would be ideal for you? And also is it the look that you dont like or the personality?
You may, but since I wouldn't have created this game this way - as I don't personally like the focus on the modern setting, current 'issues' and personalities, it seems a bit pointless to my mind for me to go into how I would create him for it.
I didn't want the series to go in this direction - toward what more people 'can relate to' as Tameem expresses - though it was probably inevitable; as you can see, most people are lapping it up.
I don't dig either the look or his personality, or the voice. But that's me.