It would've been nice to see an alternate universe with Dante being the evil twin...
i agree the biggest flaw with DmC's story for me is that is was predicableIt would've been nice to see an alternate universe with Dante being the evil twin...
They should've just ran with it.at least if Dante was the evil one this time things would have been a little more fresh
It would've been nice to see an alternate universe with Dante being the evil twin...
. I always thought DMC Dante kills demons to avenge his mother's death. Except that was caused by Mundus, and by the end of DMC 1 he kind of got his revenge by sealing Mundus for another goodness knows how many years.
unfortunately he is also the least complex one
That's why I said earlier that DMC 3 and 1 have that better connection, one in which he goes from playful to more serious.
You have to question Dante's motives, his reasons for doing what he does. I always thought DMC Dante kills demons to avenge his mother's death. Except that was caused by Mundus, and by the end of DMC 1 he kind of got his revenge by sealing Mundus for another goodness knows how many years.
This is a point that confuses me since Mundus was sealed by Sparta 2000 years ago. This means either than Dante is over 2000 years old in the first game or that Mundus didn't directly kill his mother.
i agree we already loved Dante because DMC 1I'm interested whether they will ever try to explain how Sparda died. It seems pretty crucial and I read some theories in a tread from 2006 but none really work that well. It's a huge can of worms which is probably best left alone unless they decide to do more origins stuff.
That said, I think that there is a lot of value in taking the DMC1 approach and handwaving the origins with vague references. The audiences' imaginations are a powerful tool when wielded well. I feel like DMC3 is loved more for explaining Vergil than for Dante's storyline, but I could be off base.
I'm interested whether they will ever try to explain how Sparda died. It seems pretty crucial and I read some theories in a tread from 2006 but none really work that well. It's a huge can of worms which is probably best left alone unless they decide to do more origins stuff.
That said, I think that there is a lot of value in taking the DMC1 approach and handwaving the origins with vague references. The audiences' imaginations are a powerful tool when wielded well. I feel like DMC3 is loved more for explaining Vergil than for Dante's storyline, but I could be off base.