Jin Kazama is the fighter I’m most comfortable with. I see what you tried to do by saying he is generic but last I checked there are over 50 characters in Tekken so you are not “forced” to choose Jin to play with. You have an option. In DMC you usually have 1 character to play with.
That's not my point and you missed it completely! It's the character designs we're talking about it and what peoples opinion is of them. You said, "it was an insult to the fanbase what Tameem said" when no, it wasn't because that's what he thinks of the old Dante. He didn't insult the fanbase at all but said the old Dante looks dumb. That's not insulting the fan base. I made the comparison that if I said I didn't like Jin then I guess that means I'm insulting you, when no it doesn't. We're not talking about who you're forced to play with...??????
So I guess saying “So this is the new dante take it or leave it.” is not an insult by your definition?
Sounds like an insult but source?
So now PC guys get 60 fps? What about the consoles? You know that are still at 30 fps? My point is still valid. From you avatar thing you have an xbox. DmC will still be 30 fps for you on your xbox!
Now that's just ignoring a fact. Yes it runs at 30FPS on console. But can you deny that DmC isn't running at 60FPS on some platform? So no, we're both right. But for those who say that DmC isn't running at 60FPS is wrong because the PC crowd have that available to them. See?
Your right I didn’t play the demo. Well except for the part that I actually did play the demo. 4 times or so because I wanted to try son of sparda mode to see if the enemies would try to kill me. I acted as if it were not Devil May Cry and still IMO did not enjoy it. Boss lady glitched on me as well. R1 usually allows me to perform “stinger” but I kept evading. Old habits die hard I suppose!=P
Since you took a jab at me not playing the demo and saying what others do I wanna take a jab at you. How about I remove one of the evade buttons and put a lock on button…oh yea I can’t lol
I didn't take a jab at you. You can remove the evade button but going to the controls. I also find it pointless about still asking for lock-on when you clearly know it doesn't have one. You could easily make the point "How do I remove evade and add an anti-air button, oh yeah I can't" You clearly know that this game doesn't have lock-on so I have no idea what point you're trying to make. I already said that your point about having two evade buttons is wrong because you can remove one.
DmC is singled out for glitches because I’m holding NT/Capcom responsible for NOT DOING THEIR JOB! When you are presenting a game to potential buyers I’m sure it’s not impossible to have the bugs worked out.
After you said "DmC is singled out for glitches because"
I stopped caring. A perfect example of someone who is singling out a game. I already said, why don't you acknowledge the games that have glitches. But no, you stated you're singling out DmC. Nintendo didn't do their job to fixes Zelda glitches. So go rant about them. Namco didn't do their job to fix the Ogre infinite glitch. So go rant to them. See?
The way you taking my words out of context saying that the reviewers made positive reviews JUST to insult the fans seems a little fishy but I can point out a revire that does insult the fans for not liking DmC. One IGN video review on youtube. Didn’t make it a minute into it, “If you are one of those gamers that wanted to dismiss DmC, because it wassn’t a real devil may cry game, then don’t be a baby.” The reviewer says “just kidding lol” afterwards soI guess it means it wasn’t an insult right?
No because it was a joke. Also IGN...who cares.
If you mean a reviewer than yes they are paid to enjoy it or are you telling me that gaming companies don’t pay reviewers at all. Case in point one IGN gave Tekken Tag 2 a 7.5 because it was “Fight lab was hard and had too much content all at once” while same IGN gave Marvel vs Capcom 3 an 8.5 for “great combat but no mode variety” (This is the same game where your little cards battle each other instead of spectating) Reviews are TOTALLY not bought lol
As far as actually people I believe that enjoy the game and I am happy for them. I will get back to positive feedback for the game later okay?
Ah yeah I because I said that right? I know companies like Activision and EA have paid companies in the past for reviews. You're completely dismissing any game that gets a high score as 'paid reviews'. Show how you know this.
Geez…user reviews? You mean user reviews like word of mouth? I prefer a “user review” to a game reviewing site any day. Why? The user reviews are usually fans of the series and can easily communicate with other fans. Now not all user reviews are useful (which you were getting at) but some of them are actually well written. I should know. I check amazon reviews before I buy a game (and I beat I ain’t the one who does that!=P) because they give an honest opinion and don’t care if I buy the game or not. I’ve written a couple of reviews on there as well (like with Street Fighter x Tekken) because not everyone has $65 to gamble on a video game.
Dude you can't compare Metacritic to Amazon. Metacritic user reviews is something you actually use? I fear the worst for future gamers then. Seriously user reviews on Metacritic? I'd understand if you were talking about Yahoo, eBay or Amazon but you use Metacritic sser reviews? *Sigh*
Umm the thread you were in right? I’m not here to start fights, In fact I said I didn’t approve of game bashing “or review bombing.” I tried to look at the actually reviews of the game to see what the fans thought of the game. Not every “user review” is super biased as you want to make them seem!
Please stop using Metacritic. Just...don't.
Not sure but…this sounds like one of those “user review” that are apparently not “ever good” lol
W8 WUT?
Well it was my understanding that you guys wanted to enjoy the game despite what the “haterz” thought so forgive me if I thought you all would be playing the game. I’m sorry. Also backlash Capcom created. As for that quote, I will go get it for you!
Cool cool.
The pressure came from Capcom buddy. What can I say Controversies sell right? Do you believe this game would have gotten as much hype without all that “pointless pressure” from fans?
Yes because the title they are working is call DmC. Hearing that name means you already have pressure to live up to the previous titles, regardless of pointless pressure from "fans" (See how put fans in quotation marks).
Golly gee. First Capcom/NT practically beg old fans to just give the game a shot. Any DMC fans give DmC a shot and are welcomed with a hair joke. Totally not an insult of the character they liked from the old games or nothing. Just coincidence.
Ah haha nope. Nope. I'm not falling for it. Nobody said it was a coincidence (what are you on about here)? I'm not falling for it though, I still refuse to believe that people took that scene as an genuine insult. No-one would be that dumb to say they're insulted by this. Again, I refuse to believe anyone is being serious.
We as fans of the Devil May Cry franchise has NO reason whatsoever to be fighting each other over the INTERNET about someone’s opposing opinion about a VIDEO GAME! This goes for Pro or Anti. Respectful debates explaining opinions? Yes? Flaming/trolling? No. There is NO excuse. We are on the same side in wanting a great game for the franchise.
You don’t know why I haven’t played the game. You don’t have to assume because I will tell you. I seen the trailer in 2010 and wasn’t impressed. I seen the combat trailer/gameplay and it didn’t appeal to me. I’ve even played the demo of the game and did not enjoy it. IMO it’s a mediocre mix between Devil May Cry and heavenly sword that isn’t worth $65. I didn’t enjoy the demo so what WHY would I purchase it? Demos are released to let players try a game to decide if they want to buy it or not. It’s a part of marketing if I am not mistaken.
It makes no damn sense that you condone the fans fighting because I(or “people such as myself”) don’t have the same opinion as you.
I don’t buy a game and you troll me for having a different opinion and criticize me for holding Capcom/NT to their initial promises?
The point about discussing over the Internet is just as valid. It's the remark people give when they can't back their points up. Discussing the exact same topic in real life would have the same results and responses so talking about it over Internet makes zero difference to each others credibility and standing.
I've already pointed out (in another thread) that the demo was old and the full game actually has improved on those areas.
Also if you consider someone like me to be trolling you, then you should stay off the Internet. Because I could easily say that you having a different opinion to me means you're trolling me. Stay on point at least.
You just said you “purposely find glitches” did you not? Some people playing the demo just WANTED TO PLAY THE GAME AND FOUND GLITCHES. There was a guy who failed a secret mission that was a race. He did that helm-break attack as he fell to his death then THE SCREEN WENT WHITE. HE COULDN’T PLAY THE DEMO UNTIL HE QUIT. THAT IS A PROBLEM! A problem that should be fixed by the company who made the game. I hold them accountable while you defend them for NOT DOING THEIR JOB. They are paid to NOT have glitches. What sense does it make to have glitches in a demo that is supposed to get people to want to buy the game?
You completely ignored the fact I found glitches in Tekken, maybe because you don't want to admit games like Tekken, SF, GTA, Fallout, Zelda have glitches...
Totally fact because the idea that Capcom could purposely leave portions of a game unfinished to sell later is blasphemy right? *Cough* *cough* Asura’s wrath ending *cough*
But we're not talking about Asuras Wrath. Also I AW had a great ending and I had no idea why they made an additional ending. Not only that but that ending was true DLC that wasn't removed from the game nor was is locked. The same is with Vergils DLC. You said it's a fact despite someone like me actually look at the games ISO. So er....you're again, coming up with facts from zero knowledge/assumptions.
Rumor? You mean like on disc DLC was a RUMOR and online passes were a RUMOR back then but now they are the “norm” for gaming. Wasn’t there an offline pass for Rage?
Dude, I was talking about the latest Sony Patent. It's a rumour. Where have I said I do not want this game to come out? Please point it out. I don’t care if the game comes out. I’m 21 years old and if a game comes out I don’t like I just…don’t buy it and go on with my life.
Cool I was wrong on that point then.I don’t troll people for liking the game I don’t like. I wanted it to come out so this stupid fighting amongst fans, of the same franchise, could stop. I don’t care if the game gets a 8/10, 9/10 or 10/10 if the game has truly EARNED it. IMO it’s mediocre. I watched Adam sessler’s review and it told the truth.
You consider his review to be the truth. I disagree as I thought the game had more going for it. So therefore, it's not the full truth. Again, reviews are NOT FACT but opinion and yes it was a fair review. It was a fair review. Not because it was a 3/5 but because he reviewed the game. He told good things about the game while addressing the game had some gameplay issues. The result of “high review” scores is developers getting extremely arrogant and belittling customers while not making the best game they can (which we as customers deserve because we give them a job by buying their products) they will push out an unfinished game and fill their pockets with YOUR money for what you believe to be a finished product. Capcom is notorious for this behavior.
But this game is finished. What are you on about? This is game complete. It's or not rushed or unfinished. There's a few tweaks they could've done but it's still a pretty much fully completely game.
Where was the kick in the bum when UMvC3 came out?
The kick in the bum. You mean the fact the game failed to even break the million sales mark? This game added “online spectating” and “new characters” for $39.99. It was 10 years between MvC2 and MvC3. Then 8 months between MvC3 and UMvC3? Why did it take SFxT to stand up and say, “HEY! That’s enough Capcom. We don’t like that mess.” The companies will back down if we unite our concerns. Everyone called those who were disappointed with ME3’s ending “whiners” then they united and GOT STUFF DONE! The company made a better ending. We pay their salaries dude. Without the customers the company can’t exist. However with people like you (who bash others for having different opinions and accept anything pushed out by companies as “good” ) People who will blindly support/defend these companies, prevent positive change from being done. How do you expect DmC (or any game) to improve if they are already perfect according to reviews? Boy did Capcom/NT prove the haters like me wrong because DmC is a step forward in the series. The combat/story is better than any past DMC game. It has no flaws whatsoever.
<-Who said that?
This is exactly what I am talking about! We need to grow up and set aside this petty fighting and look at what is best for the community. Voicing your concerns with DmC gameplay (or any other issues you have) will improve the next game in the franchise opposed to *excuse the crude reference, just trying to get a point across, not trying to insult anyone* “Herp Derp DmC is perfeeeeect”
Gosh why do you people realize that?
So then why are you here? Not a single person (since I've been on this forum) has blindly fanboyed/hated on this game. Not a single person! This forum is extremely respectable. Why? Because the majority are a fan who learned the in-depth combat. There are some people on here who are extremely knowledgeable
See once again. “I won because I got a game I liked” Why are you even apart of these forums if you are that selfish?
Because you said we lost when we really didn't. I won because I got a game I liked. I didn't have Day1 DLC, or locked content or online passes. I found the story to be amazing and had me invested in the story. I'm currently exploring the combat and showing what game is capable of(see my YouTube). I won because I gave this game a shot and was rewarded in return. YOU haven't even played the game are coming to the conclusion that we lost. Don’t you get it? I though forums like this was for fans of the same games to talk about what they like/dislike about a game and try to improve the future games. You keep throwing in "Have you bought and completed the game like me? No because your a hater who just played the demo and didn't buy it" I may not care for this DmC game but I care about the Devil May Cry franchise. Apparently as long as "you win" and "get the game you like" nothing else matters.
Exactly, exactly what I said. Completely 100% It's the people like yourself why the gaming industry has gotten as bad as it has.
Actually no people like you are. People who don't read comments. Make up facts with no evidence. Come to conclusions without having to experience it for themselves. You're telling me(!) how I'm wrong for knowing about the game than you. Right. Don't get me wrong the gaming community has always had problems but they were not this extreme. Gamers of the past respected each other enough to look for the wellbeing of their fellow gamer. You don't care for anyone but yourself. So long as you get the game you want you don't care for the consequences of your actions. That is why people call people immature "fanboys." The Devil May Cry community consists of more than yourself.
Really did not know that, thanks. The gaming community consists of more than yourself. This is bigger than you getting a game. This is bigger than me not getting a game. The entire Devil May Cry franchise (for or against this game) has taken a step backwards (be it in actually gameplay or just basic respect for one another). How do we, as the Devil May Cry community, get past this and get the gameplay issue across to Capcom/NT to prevent it happening again in future games?
...I know we have to stop fighting each other over a video game...
