They used Dante's Inferno as an example of a "real book" and then got mad when people pointed out it's a self-insert and they said it didn't count because there wasn't any smut in it.
-looks pointedly at the entire genfic genre and the lack of smut there-
I mean...I disagree with the notion that the majority of fanfic is bad, but I think that also comes down to personal experience. Most of the fics I've read on sites have been good--I think I can only count out two that were beyond redemption horrible. Most of the lacklustre ones just needed more work/experience or just weren't interpretations I vibed with which made me leave. I understand that's not the case for everyone. But like...my real issue is: where does the line between fanfiction and "real books" begin and end? If fanfics are bad or lazy or not real stories or whatever, then what about derivatives that people get paid to publish? What about retellings, reimaginings, and pastiches? What about stories where it's rewritten from another character's POV? What about reboots and those people who write novels based on games or movies or comics? What about comic writers? They're all written by fans of the original source material and yet...we don't say that people are bad writers because they wrote a new version of Holmes or Alice in Wonderland or Pride and Prejudice or Shakespeare. And what about on a larger scale? If fanfiction is works based on something you love and found inspiration in, and we can all agree there's no such thing as a truly original story idea, then...what does that mean for stories that are heavily inspired by something? What if the only reason readers don't know what's inspired it is because the author covered their tracks really well? What if the author themself doesn't even realise what inspired them? Do these stories count as "original" fiction if something had such a hand in inspiring them that said thing silently, possibly-unknowingly helped cast them into being? It almost certainly comes down to personal interpretation, but I think it still is worthy of questioning. But it's like...what about the writer getting paid makes derivative or inspired-by works suddenly
not fanfiction, but apparently good or real writing? Sometimes a writer gets picked up because they're marketable, not because they're good. (Thank you, publisher friend, for that horrifying thought.) Is it only fanfiction if it's not gone through a screening process? What about fic writers with editors? What about paid authors who write fanfic on the side? (Like, Neil Gaiman won a pretty high-profile award for a fanfic he wrote; one would assume that's the opposite of bad...) I just have questions and it seems like no one really wants to dig into the semantics of it or think about how weirdly blurred the defining lines of fiction get when you start looking into it.
I think I'm just gonna have to hold with Wilde that stories are well written, or badly written. Everything else is too confusing and has too many scary possibilities to consider. LOL
I'm sorry it's the middle of the night and I'm physically incapable of shutting up. <3