Western epic, Game of the Year
- Thread starter Richtofen
- Start date
Esura;293047 said:
My sentiments exactly.
Frankly I think Mass Effect 2 should have taken the damn show, at least it wasn't Reach or Black Ops.
Dark Drakan
Well-known Member
Well deserved id say, it tried something new in a time period very few people were interested in and it wasnt a sequel as such. One of the games ive enjoyed the most in a long time.
Dark Drakan
Well-known Member
Vergil'sB*tch;293092 said:GTA on a horse.
Love it. :wub:
I liked it much more than any GTA game, there was just so much more you could do and the characters were great & story was involving.
Dark Drakan;293067 said:
I'll agree with you on the fact that it tried something new, it was definitely a brave effort that went very, very well for Rockstar, but me personally? I just found Mass Effect 2 to be the much better game, hence my displeasure at RDR getting official GOTY.
Honestly, FFXIII or Bayonetta should of won imo, and this is coming from a huge Rockstar fan (since GTA San Andreas). Not saying that Red Dead Redemption isnt a good game...its a damn good one, but...it really feels like a western GTA IV with horses.Dark Drakan;293067 said:
Storm Silves;293136 said:
Yes...yes they did. Which is why I do not take mainstream seriously anymore. They all be trolling on my gaming fandom. Hard to be a JRPG, well Japanese games in general, fan nowadays. :lol:
Happy to see that Red Dead Redemption won the Game of the Year award. However, I wished that Mass Effect 2 will get it though.
However, I wished that Mass Effect 2 will get it though.
I didn't play much of Red Dead Redemption, but I say this is probably the right choice.
I too would have preferred Mass Effect 2, but in the long run, RDR did more innovatively and was more well received
I too would have preferred Mass Effect 2, but in the long run, RDR did more innovatively and was more well received
Dark Drakan
Well-known Member
Angelo Credo;293120 said:
I really enjoyed Mass Effect 2 and would have been happy if that won too. However many expressed their displeasure at it heading more down the shooter route with the RPG elements watered down.
Dark Drakan;293190 said:
I agree with that notion, but I think the changes are rather necessary and effective to make it a better game than the first one. The RPG elements in the first game is rather confusing and complicated to learn.
Dark Drakan
Well-known Member
Chaos Master;293191 said:
Another point people made is that they went against their own 'lore' to please the mindless shooter fans by adding ammo counts to the weapons after saying the weapons didnt need ammo because the tech was so advanced it merely overheated.
Dark Drakan;293201 said:
Agreed. About that, I don't know if BioWare did the right thing, but I find that is is much better than waiting your weapons to cooldown after a period of time like in Mass Effect 1. Thermal clips are useful, and it is used to explain the 'ammo count' in Mass Effect 2.
Dark Drakan
Well-known Member
Chaos Master;293208 said:Agreed. About that, I don't know if BioWare did the right thing, but I find that is is much better than waiting your weapons to cooldown after a period of time like in Mass Effect 1. Thermal clips are useful, and it is used to explain the 'ammo count' in Mass Effect 2.
I didnt mind it personally but it was one of the gripes i heard a lot about.
Good thing it`s RDR, i three(four,five,six,million) would have preferred ME2, but oh well, next on the list was Fallout New Vegas, too bad ;__;
Don`t own any consoles, so can`t judge RDR, but from what i`ve heard i won`t argue, i bet it`s a good game and deserves the title.
Just happy that FF didin`t win ^^ fu fanboys, FF7 was great later it went downhill.
Don`t own any consoles, so can`t judge RDR, but from what i`ve heard i won`t argue, i bet it`s a good game and deserves the title.
Just happy that FF didin`t win ^^ fu fanboys, FF7 was great later it went downhill.