Sparda's rejected son
For Edenoi!
Nothing in that post gives any indication that DmC will have a disk DLC.
Nothing I say! :|
Nothing I say! :|
There is a high probability that DmC will have on disc DLC
- Thread starter Terrence
- Start date
Danteredgrave
"I make the angels scream and the devil cry"
Sparda's rejected son
For Edenoi!
That doesn't mean DmC was of those games per say.
Danteredgrave
"I make the angels scream and the devil cry"
It is no proof of course
but even though they didn't bother to give us any game titles, DmC is one of the games whose development started some time ago and which are going to be released in the coming month, so according to the article it is likely to be one of the games featuring this system, isn't it? I'm not saying that it surely will have it, just that it may have it... and since they didn't mention any specific games... it fulfills all the requirements
Sparda's rejected son
For Edenoi!
It is no proof of course
Fair Enough.
V's patron
be loyal to what matters
I dislike the concept of on-disk DLC since its already on the disk so its something i should already have access too on not have to pay extra money for.
So i hope they dont have it.
So i hope they dont have it.
HailTheKing
Battousai The Manslayer
CASHCOM always amazes me! :troll:
Nelo_Vergil
Well-known Member
i wonder, and i don't mean for it to sound like a rant so sorry if it does. Whats the difference between on disk dlc,day one dlc that's not on disc,and dlc? does not being on disc justify buying it? or does it get ripped just for being dlc, because after all most people feel entitled to anything released after the games intial release.
What justifies buying really? i know blood festival is suppose to be a good example of dlc done right but it doesn't add to the infamous2 story line its more like a mini-game IMO. I hope you understand what i trying to say, because i can't seem to find the perfect words for this.
BTW z did you come from capcom-unity? could've sworn i've seen the name there.
Actually Blood Festival wasn't DLC and you didn't need InFamous2 to play it. Think of it as a PSN game.
Nelo_Vergil
Well-known Member
788Masri
I'm just some guy who really like Devil May Cry
no its just when you buy the game and find out theres dlc on the disk you need to buy you know they thought "hey lets add this...naah lets just charge them extra for it". a particularly annoying example was tekken, if you preordered the game you got extra characters. except they charged you for them either way aaaaaand they were on the disj AAAANDDD THE GAME HAD THE LEAST AMOUNT OF CHARACTERS THAN ANY PREVIOUS OF THE SERIES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNDDDDD THEY CHARGED YOU EXTRA FOR CONTENT YOU ESSENSIALLY BOUGHT CUZ IT WAS ALREADY ON THE ****KKING DISK!!!!!!
ahem....sorry. repressed rage and all. so yh i dont approve of dlc on disk its just another way for them to squeeze a few extra pounds out of us
V's patron
be loyal to what matters
I think it really depends on where you stand on DlC.
For me, I rather DlC be extra additions that are optional like infamous festival of blood or pigsy's perfect ten rather than just half the stuff that should be on the game charged for an extra price like Asura's wrath or ff13-2.
nope but Z is a common letter.
AngelMode
Well-known Member
I agree, adding to the story or not, that has nothing to do with how DLCs should be done. They are misusing DLCs as lockable content that you have to pay for to get. In my opinion, those two should be completely different things. Back in the days when there was no such thing as DLCs, you got all the content there was right there. You beat the game on hard and the game rewarded you by giving you content that was unlocked beforehand. But now you have to pay money to get those... there is no reward in that, you just lost money! So, essentially, what they are telling me now is: "Games no longer cost 60 bucks... that's only an incomplete version. You need to pay more to get the full game."
And I mean, I understand how technology has advanced and how games for older consoles cost less than the ones for this generation. PS2 games were around $50? I don't remember. But yeah... we are still talking about this generation of games that SHOULD still cost $60.
And I mean, I understand how technology has advanced and how games for older consoles cost less than the ones for this generation. PS2 games were around $50? I don't remember. But yeah... we are still talking about this generation of games that SHOULD still cost $60.
V's patron
be loyal to what matters
Festival of blood completely works because it is optional and more like a stand-alone demo.
788Masri
I'm just some guy who really like Devil May Cry
very true, at this point i think we agree that if capcom release a bunch of new levels for dlc itd be pretty boss. question is if the dlc is stuff like extra weapons would you buy it??
McdD
Ignorant and closeminded - That's me :D
If it's extra weapons then your getting ripped off.
Early DLC is rip off. A good example that it may not be a rip off is Blood Festival - a big package of content.
A early DLC = rip off.
A single item = a rip off.
Basically ur paying for items u shud have.
788Masri
I'm just some guy who really like Devil May Cry
YES YOUR GOD DAMN RIGHT!!!!
well if its like a weapon pack released...lets say a month after the games out or an angel trigger:O then what would you think? (personally id prbs get it)
YOURE SO ****ING RIGHT!!!! (AND CAPCOMS ANOUNCED THEYRE RECONSIDERING THE WHOLE DISC CONTENT THING SO HOORAY, MORAL OF THE STORY IF SOMETHING ANNOYS YOU WHINE)