Gilver's sword, his name was engraved in the hilt and it later crumbled into dust.
.............sooooooo Gilver and the Yamato both perished?
Gilver's sword, his name was engraved in the hilt and it later crumbled into dust.
.............sooooooo Gilver and the Yamato both perished?
Gilver didn't die, he was knocked unconscious by Dante's bullets but he woke up and started to fade away.
Fade away........like how? So what about his sword?
Yup its Rebellion?
Gilver's name was engraved in the hilt. Dante found himself ripping off his amulet.
He stared alternately between the sword and the amulet,
a sickening realization settling across his mind.
The amulet had two names inscribed on it. One was Dante. The other was Vergil.
The name of his twin brother, who was lost the day his mother had died.
The same face. The same hair color. The same amulet.
Dante dropped both items, letting himself fall back to the floor.
The sword, having lost its master, crumbled to dust.
Gilver had been Dante's brother. Two sides of the same coin.
The impact washed over him, pervading his soul.
So Gilver left his sword behind and it was destroyed meaning that either was another sword and not Yamato and if it was Yamato......then how can the events of DMC3 transpire (as well as DMC4) with Yamato out of the picture?
Lame ass DMC3 retconned everything about the book.
So that could mean the order of the original DMC series canon story is:Well dante in DMC 3 did say "its been a long time since we last met RIGHT VERGIL?"
so that could mean that all the evens in novel did take place before DMC 3.. Vergil wearing bandages,working with dante&stuff
So that could mean the order of the original DMC series canon story is:
DMC Novel Vol. 1 -> DMC3 Manga -> DMC3 -> DMC1 -> DMC Anime -> DMC4 -> DMC Novel Vol 2/DMC2 Novel -> DMC2
You might mean Shinya Goikeda who had a similar thinking with Kamiya-san; hence why he only assisted, which makes Goikeda the main writer.Well in the DMC3 manga, Dante was extremely surprised when he saw Vergil (as it was his first time) and shocked to see that he was alive and prior to that when demons said that Dante was the only survivor of the demon attack he didn't seem to correct or doubt that. Not only that Vergil also had Yamato which was destroyed in the DMC1 novel and Vergil didn't recall anything or reflect on anything he did while he was Gilver almost as if it never happened.
Fun fact....the DMC1 novel and DMC3 manga were written around the same time but as extra promotional material for DMC3's Japanese release (similar to how DMC4 got an anime). The person who wrote the DMC1 novel was Kamiya and some other dude and the person who wrote the DMC3 manga was Noboru Sugimori (the guy who wrote DMC1 along with Kamiya or DMC1s scenario writer) so both were targeted to take place before DMC3 but Itsuno's team or Capcom paid more attention to the DMC3 manga for it well contained much more elements to DMC3 than the DMC1 novel practically ignoring anything the DMC1 novel brought up practically rendering it non-canon or irrelevant......buuutt the anime did bring up some plot points from the DMC1 novel such as Tony Redgrave and Neil Goldstein.
The main reason why this happened was that Noboru in fact got more help from the story team for DMC3 to help him write a story that would fit right in so he was given details on crucial plot points in DMC3 while Kamiya was along in the dark and went by what he heard or knew of DMC3's development such as one character in the novel name was changed since it was a multi headed dog and there was already three headed dog in DMC3 (Cerberus). It was almost as if Itsuno's team didn't know Kamiya was making a novel or didn't care.
Unknown was delving down into the thoughts of those DMC1 purists who hated DMC3; even up 'til now, they still loathe DMC3, even DMC4. VA Reuben Langdon even received hate mail regarding it, according to an interview. That is what he told me via PM.I havent read dmc 1 novels, but i hear kamiya was involved.
Anyway with or without KAmiya , reading some of the novel, it sounds better than DMC3.
Still DMC3 is also nice.
Well the book did contradict some aspects of DMC1 as well such as Dante claiming in DMC1 he was sure that Mundus killed his brother but in the book Dante knew Gilver was Vergil soooooo....why would Dante say Vergil was killed by Mundus in DMC1 if the last time he saw Vergil he either disappeared or was killed..........by him...Dante not Mundus.
Also, Gilver's personality even conflicts with that of Nelo Angelo's as well. Nelo was well an honorable person and fought fair. Gilver was dirty and somewhat cheap in his tactics...so being brainwashed and corrupted by a demon overlord who too is as dirty if not more dirty than Gilver makes you honorable.
You may want to argue with those people Unknown and I were talking about... I agree; purist is such an ugly word to describe them. Those were not my wordings; it's just what I think those people have claimed. They think any DMC story Kamiya made is the true DMC canon up until DMC2, since he assisted Goikeda on making the two volume light novels. For them, they hate DMC3, the DMC3 Manga, the anime, and even DMC4 with a passion as it is not canon.I don't think the word "purist" is a word you should use. It's really ugly word. Words like these are made each day and they serve only to patronize people.
For example, do you know DMC fan base were described with the word "entitled"? That's not nice.
Hence my friendly advice: dont use that word.
Anyway, i can like DMC3 for what it is and what they achieved. For example DMC3 Vergil is so stylish and the thoughts they put into his swordsmanship.
I dont like retcons.
But for DMC3:
1) They didn't retcon much, and they still kept the character design of Dante and Vergil more or less.
2) Capcom had no choice. The people who made DMC1 were not around. So they had to make something, and they did.
And i can't critize Capcom for wanting to make a DMC game despite the story department was missing important key personell.
The most important thing for a reboot to happen and not anger people, is to be respectful towards the fans of the original.
Dont be arrogant, or say something that sounds arrogant.
And yes i know Gilver is Vergil Thanks for telling me though incase i did not.
But he is one of the pillars of Ninja theory.It's Tameem, not NT, that has the bad rep. NT, fire this guy and find a better co-founder...!
Don't let one person's view get to your head. For me, Tameem and his views do not matter to me...!
Still, by what you said. Who cares if he is one of NT's pillars?But he is one of the pillars of Ninja theory.
And i doubt if he is fired (not that i want that), that the rest of NT will think "Yeah, he was disrespectful". They will probably think "Gamers are entitled".
Anyway i dont get anything from him getting fired. Best thing i hope is that his reboot version of Dante never prevails. That it crashes downwards.
Because as i said, he do not deserve that after disrespecting the original Dante, and the fans.