I got the HD collection and it had been forever since I had played any of the games, but if, for example, you play DMC3 and then move over to DMC1, you will see how exactly outdated DMC1 is. I got used to the controls after a while, but everything about that game is slower than the rest of them. You had incredibly annoying fixed camera angels, you actually had to hold down the trigger to shoot while on the ground for some reason, styles appeared in DMC3 so forget about that, the story was horrible given to you (note I'm talking about what was happening in the game, the whole actual story is awesome), and Dante had the cheesiest most awkward lines in the universe. If anything, back in the days it was fun, it is still today as long as you put a blind eye to all of this, and it gave birth to an incredibly good series.... and DMC2.
really? how so, so far only like...two moves are like neros' and even so. i liked a lot of neros moves. the red queen combos where interesting. i perticularly liked the one where he smashed his enemy again and again like his sword was a hammer. actually conveyed his short temper and immaturity. but other than that i agree with you.
I never said Nero's moves were bad. Like I personally prefer streak over stinger any day. But the new Dante plays a lot like Nero, not only in terms of moves but in his mechanics. He has a basic four hit main attack with his sword as opposed to Dante's three hitter, same as Nero (not to mention Rebellion Combo B makes an X shape slash, another one of Nero's basic combos), and his whips work exactly like Nero's devil snatch.
Besides that, I have seen as many Nero moves as I have seen Dante's. I can probably count you down and it would be a pretty much equal amount on both sides with Dante winning by a hair. Since many of the rest of the moves are new and neither Nero or Dante ever had them to begin with.