yeah i agree with this ^Well, not necessarily. If you take this along with the previous paragraph, you get the meaning that his point is that "our Dante is less cool in terms of design/appearance, but at least we're going to explain why he is the way he is, while the first Dante is what he is just because he can"
Tbh, I still prefer the first Dante no matter what they sayXD
I was thinking of games onlyI disagree with all that CoolDemon. For me Dante has had enough development, motives, reason, etc. He might appear a lazy carefree guy who does nothing all day but that is not his only feature. Novels, games, manga, etc. How can he not be developed character wise?
Also, I believe the paragraph that mrrandomlulz quoted, to which I replied is focused on Dante's appearance, not the character, so I'm not sure where you're coming from, quoting me to say that. ^^;
I was thinking of games only
Well we know Dante doesn't take life to serious. But after DMC 1 we never got much more info about Dante and his family.Well for me, even the games provided us with enough info to shape his character, but maybe that's just meXD
Of course they could have added more, I'm sure.
Well we know Dante doesn't take life to serious. But after DMC 1 we never got much more info about Dante and his family.
DMC 3 and 4 was pretty much DMC 1 Dante if he was playing around all the time.
It's funny how you comment on it but say your not going to.It's funny to read how offended people on here get by misintepretating this article. XD
I'm not going to comment on it though, I get what they are trying to say.
can we not have one thread in the DmC section that dissolves into an arguement?
can we not have one thread in the DmC section that dissolves into an arguement?
You talking about me or Zwei?Yes, ofcourse we can have one thread that doesn't dissovles into an argument......until a random smart-ass comes and posts some random generalised crap.
you're probably right.impossible.
we got nothing else to go on.
How about you talk about how Zwei a DmC supporter mocks people for trying to understand?you're probably right.
i hate that everyone just keeps on going in circles. supporters say positive things, and the people who don't like the game say negative things, its a vicious circle. earlier i agreed with what tony said because i'm pretty sure ninja theory didn't mean to offend anybody, i mean they know that if they say anything wrong people are gonna jump all over it, so i think what ninja theory said wasn't MEANT to be taken offensively. HOWEVER i can see how some people think it sounds offensive because of the "americans, more functionality" statement, but how about we actually try to understand one another instead of:
"ninja theory just offended us!"
"no they didn't poophead! you're just a hater!"
you obviously didn't understand anything i just said.How about you talk about how Zwei a DmC supporter mocks people for trying to understand?
But it's like this:
Be positive about DmC and mock DmC haters - it's OK
Be negative about DmC - your dirt.
If you don't like that "circle" how about you don't critize the DmC supporters that wants to keep it going such as Zwei? How about you do that ?
I don't see how it's not negative, but i guess since i am negatively affect by DmC i must see it as negative right? But that does not apply to people poistively affect by DmC.
People who are positively affected by DmC have crystal clear eyes for everything Ninja theory says. They never misunderstand.
I see that now. I am sorry - but i guess that means nothing now.you obviously didn't understand anything i just said.
i was asking BOTH sides: DmC supporters and Anti-DmC supporters to start understanding one another instead of criticizing each other all the time, and just arguing instead of friendly debating with one another, because its really starting to affect the forum. just about every thread in the DmC section dissolves into some type of arguement.