8BitHero
Scrub
Bloody Palace being free or DLC is ABSURD. Because it has become a standard within DMC games. And if Capcom is going to convince any gamers or hardcore fans that DmC Devil May Cry will be a great DMC game - what other way is there other than including things in the game that makes Devil May Cry for Devil May Cry.
Bloody Palace is one of those.
What would be more ridicolous is if i accepted that idea that BP would be a DLC. You know what that means? That Capcom MAY HAVE planned to sell BP as dlc. Yes...sell a content people expect as a DLC.
As for the costumes:
3 of them are for sale, that includes a DMC 3 costume that resembles original Dante than any other costumes including ones that aren't sold. And fans wanted original Dante, but don't worry the best costume will be for sale.
Now that leaves Vergil's downfall:
I asked Gbraga "How do you if VD isn't content taken out of full game intentionally for more money?".
Gbraga doesn't know.
I don't know.
Neither do you.
SPEAKING FOR MYSELF: i wouldn't trust or approve of DLC that is announced before main game is even released and that is released few months after main game. According to VG247 Vergil's downfall was known to public around 12th november - that's roughly 2 months before main game was to be released.
Now if you have facts that disapproves what i have said then fair enough, but if you don't: don't go around thinking it's a fact that VD is a free DLC because you think it is.
You can't trust Capcom. The reason DmC was delayed to 2013 was because of competition. I'd argue BP was released around the same date as MGR to keep DmC relevant from a "content release" perspective, to create more attention and tackle Metal Gear Rising taking the spotlight.
And VD is technically free. It's not free for post release buyers.
I tell you what, if it is right to accept BP as dlc, then Capcom can go ahead and sell other things that is good by DMC as dlc. For example they can sell style system for DmC as dlc.
Want style system but DmC doesn't have it? Dont worry pay 10 dollars and ull have it.
P.S Are you forgetting that you paid 60 dollars for DmC?
Vergils Downfall and Bloody Palace/DLCs explained:
I don't like talking about it much but a friend and I actually rip games to look at the code and mess around with. Create mods, or having fun screwing with mechanics and sometimes to see if developers(Publishers really) are trying to scam the fanbase. I bring this up because we did in fact look through DmC on launch and didn't find a single trace of BP or VD. I even made a post just before the DmC launch stating that I'm expecting the people over at NeoGAF to find content hidden on the game, memory allocated for it or any information regarding future updates.
Not a single developer in the history of gaming has ever gotten away with taking content out of the game. From Javik in Mass Effect 3, to SFxT and the entire load of BS that game was or the recent information regarding RE6's future update. The reason they don;t get away with it because when you make a game you have create space for it. You write that section of the game, finish it, take out but leave the space there so that when the DLC is downloaded, it's placed back in the original spot. It's kinda like ordering a pizza and you noticing round marks on it. You realise that pepperoni have been taken out as they were clearly there before and left a mark. That's how games work. But no trace of BP or VD was to be found. DLC that was on the disc was the weapon skins and Dante skins but nothing else. I know what I'm talking about dude...
Also Ninja Theory did (essentially) state they made a mistake by not adding BP. That's why it's free and will stay free because they realise they should've added one of the best replay experiences to the DMC games. Any company that admits they were wrong gains a +1 from me, not only that but to give it away for free is another +1.
About the skins:
The Dante/Weapon skins are free for those who bought it on PC and those who pre-ordered on console. I'm completely with you on bullcrap business practices, especially from Capcom, but giving them away as a pre-order incentive isn't nearly as much as a blow as normal. I still don't agree with it, but they're free
Style system:
You have to face the fact that DmC doesn't have a style system. Stop bitching.
Lastly:
Do you actually have a source for "I'd argue BP was released around the same date as MGR to keep DmC relevant from a "content release" perspective, to create more attention and tackle Metal Gear Rising taking the spotlight."
I'd like to see were you got that information from. Delaying DmC is a smart move. Why would you release a game around the time when CoD is released? Delaying it to be the first big release of the year is a smart move since consumers will have money and you won't have to worry about being forgotten due to CoDs month in November. Not only that bu the difference between DmC and MGRR. If they really wanted to compete with MGRR they'd release it during the same weekend like BF3 and CoDMW3. Not a month apart. If a game is delayed I can't complain since they're working their asses of on it. Look at Bioshock Infinite.
Edit: If you would like to see the severity of delaying games. I highly suggest you read this:
http://wiiudaily.com/2013/02/rayman-legends-developers-protest-ubisofts-delay/
Delaying games isn't as good as it sounds