I understand what you mean but i think the reboot was too different or out of place compared to the others so that caused the backlash. The other four still felt part of a whole even if they weren't connected that well but DmC just felt out of place.Well if you think about it, every DMC had a different style. There was never a "recognizable" DMC other then Dante having white hair and a red coat.
DMC1: J-movie cinima
DMC2: A dark gothic movie
DMC3: Anime movie
DMC4: shonen/romance anime movie
DmC: Hollywood/ British movie
Every DMC has had a different style, but the constant is that Dante always wears a red coat and has white hair.
So at first it was Dante's look that was the problem, and that just grew along with the FPS (Which no one really cared about until it was confirmed) figuring out this Dante is half angel, and a whole bunch of other hates for it.
But its exsistence is a sigh of the tradition changing and what they loved is slowly fading away.
Though I don't care cause I prefer the new look over the old anyway.^_^:troll:
But would they be able to draw conclusions between the two given DMC has become a face in the crowd since there are a lot of things that are similar to it already.I think that if they made it a new IP, they'd just call it a copy of DMC because of all the similar themes. It's really something where the creators of the game just can't win.
I understand what you mean but i think the reboot was too different or out of place compared to the others so that caused the backlash. The other four still felt part of a whole even if they weren't connected that well but DmC just felt out of place.
I'm not trying to make excuses or say its right or wrong but to provide context.
But would they be able to draw conclusions between the two given DMC has become a face in the crowd since there are a lot of things that are similar to it already.
It would no more be copying it than hellboy, or buffy, or the mortal instruments or legacy of kain or darksiders or Ninja gaiden or Ao no exorsist or no more heroes or shadow of the damned etc.
I think people might have accepted it better as a new ip that grew out of DMC because DMC itself grew out of ideas for RE4.
Something similar to this:
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...hty-dog-almost-made-a-new-jak-and-daxter.aspx
the whole "son of a demon/human pairing and fighting against demons because of tragedy' thing and both sets of brothers mimics each others so it felt like a good example.Wait. How is it like Ao no exorsist?
the whole "son of a demon/human pairing and fighting against demons because of tragedy' thing and both sets of brothers mimics each others so it felt like a good example.
this as well.The gehenna/Assiah thing too. Both seperate realms and opposite of each other.
It somehow works like the human world/Limbo in this game minus the inception thing.
i did like the darker direction of the first trailer so it would be cool to see that played with more.I'm not sure I agree with this ether, I can't say it's wrong because you might also be right, but I don't fully agree.
DmC was going on another direction when they first started out. Dante was a more notasably angry charater with a much more dark take on the character. There was medical torture, burning cigarets on demon's eyes, a scrawny protagonist with a grittier air to him, and less smiles and cockiness out of him; he didn't seem like the smiling type.
I actually miss the darker grittier thing they were going for initially. I personally hated old Dante as a character and seeing the new take really excited me. I was sad when they crumbled to the pressure and made him a old Dante clone in a lot of ways.
But would they be able to draw conclusions between the two given DMC has become a face in the crowd since there are a lot of things that are similar to it already.
It would no more be copying it than hellboy, or buffy, or the mortal instruments or legacy of kain or darksiders or Ninja gaiden or Ao no exorsist or no more heroes or shadow of the damned etc.
I think people might have accepted it better as a new ip that grew out of DMC because DMC itself grew out of ideas for RE4.
Something similar to this:
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...hty-dog-almost-made-a-new-jak-and-daxter.aspx
Actually no, because it looks different than what people are used to, you are sub-conciously prone to hate it, whether it's good or notI think you bring up some good points and I agree with it for the most part, but as shown in the comments above, there are more to it than just that.
Actually no, because it looks different than what people are used to, you are sub-conciously prone to hate it, whether it's good or not
No, it's really just that. Read this book called "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell. We are sub-conciously prone to hate things that are radically different to what we are used to, even if they are beneficial to usAs said, I do agree that it is a factor, but it would be too narrowminded to think it that's all there is to it.
It's not just one book about it actually, it's about dozens of stories of real life events that happened and why people thought that way about it. The book references dozens of studies that were conducted as well. I can't remember it off of the top of my head, but he called it "thin-slicing". Feel free to google itJust because one man has written a book about it doesn't mean that it is the sole truth.
Tell that to other subjects like racism. It's really as simple as that man. It's why so many people hate bronies. They challenge the social norm. Different = hateIt's a nice theory, but to say "Hatred = Different" just sounds too simple and unrealistic. Humans are alot more complicated than that.