Because let's be realistic here. The game is a work in progress and as stated before, we know pretty close to nothing about it. What we do know is from them advertising the game and showing how combat is. That's fine. Base opinions on that. Formulate a well thought out argument against that. But don't just sit there and act like you ("you" as in general population not YOU specifically) know everything about a game and that it's the worst thing ever based on pure speculation and twisted facts. This is the sheep mentality that game companies refer to. One person dislikes what they see over design (yes DESIGN, because if he had his white hair and exact same facial structure, you wouldn't be looking at every single detail and judging so harshly and, let's just be honest here, quite unfairly) and so they twist all of what has been revealed from interviews into something that will make more people angry and back them up. We have no evidence of story nor have we seen any actual completed gameplay. We have no idea on fluidity, controls, in-game graphics, voice actors (save for the lack of Reuben Langdon), characters, etc. Again, what can you possibly criticize about the game? A trailer (which was really only the announcement of the game), Beta/pre-Beta gameplay footage, and a biased article that falsely reported an interview. There isn't anything TO base an opinion on in order to HAVE one.