plus at my height I have a distinct advantage so ud be swing your arms at air lmao
Or at your crotch hehehe...
plus at my height I have a distinct advantage so ud be swing your arms at air lmao
Yeah, I was thinking that, but didn't want to say anything lolol.Or at your crotch hehehe...
you guys aren't making any further points and are kind of unintentionally steering the thread into off topic posts. So, y'know...probably made my point now.
Thanks guys for keeping this at a civil, respectable level :thumbsup:
Back to topic , I think Vergil would have lost the battle no matter what weapon he wielded
Back to topic , I think Vergil would have lost the battle no matter what weapon he wielded
No, I just think the story demands it and people would've hated on Capcom if Vergil won.I agree. But only because he was meant to lose. It was a way to move his story along and set up the premise for DMC 1.
But the two theories don't mesh unless there's some connecting factor, in my opinion.It is simple really dante gained power going through the tower fighting the gate keepers and by the time he met vergil for the final time he had surpassed him. That and it is a recurring theme that demons amd cambions who embrace humanity are stronger than ones that don't
Yeah, but he would've won if he were fighting against Dante alone. Dante needed Vergil's help to win, so that theory doesn't wash either.The biggest hint that corruption overwhelms and stops you from achieving true power is arkham turning into a blob after wielding the sparda sword.
No, I just think the story demands it and people would've hated on Capcom if Vergil won.
Instead of giving us a reason like "humanity" for Dante's victory, why not use something else in conjunction with the concept of humanity itself?
Being "more compassionate" doesn't automatically mean (close) victory, after all.