Time is too abstract to call it eternal, yesterday is no longer here, so it's like it died. On the other hand, energy is eternal or very close to it, it cannot disappear or be destroyed, it can only change forms.
Yesterday is just an instance of time, not time itself, which is a dimension, like width, height and length. Dimensions are eternal, as they cannot cease to exist, so LOD got it right.
"Consider, can the universe be justifiably called infinite? Doubtful. It may not have a discernable end, but it had a beginning, and its component parts definitely have a limited cosmological shelf-life. Splitting hairs or not, if history tells us anything, it's that scientists make very poor poets. We're all just a ship of fools chasing phantoms heedless of what really underwrites natural law."
But, I digress. Time also cannot exist if there is nothing for it to affect. If there is 'nothing' in the universe because it has long expired, then time would expire along with it. Until such a point that something comes into existance that can be observed by time once again.
I agree with @Foxtrot94 on the matter of time. And the definition of immortality is never dying or decaying. An immortal being can still be killed. However, you can also say that a statue commemorating someone's life is a way of preserving the memory of them and what they achieved, almost like keeping them alive in spirit. There are different ways to look at the word, but I do think time is eternal.
I forget where the quote is from, but my favourite one on the matter is: "Immortality is not that a man cannot die, but how many times he has come back from death"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.