Which prequel do you think did a better job of talking Dante/Vergil's past and why?
I wanna read the novels to get a better comparison. But from what I've heard, I'm leaning more to DMC1 novels for atleast explaining where Dante got his guns, and Dante pretty much starting off his devil hunter life subtly and in a dark city.
Summary anyone ?? cus not many people own that ya know ?
"Tony is a rough-and-tumble jack-of-all-trades with extraordinary physical prowess and a fierce fighting attitude. His encounter with Gilver, a mysterious swordsman swathed in bandages, changes his life dramatically. He is thrust into the dark underworld of an unsolvable case, separated from the life he knew, and pushed over the edge of desperation. Who's forcing him into a corner? What do they hope to achieve?"
So Dante's in hell what next ? who's this gliver guy ? and is Dante real name "Tony" ? but in the flashbacks as kid his mother calls him dante so i guess it was his alias ?Nothing quite sums it up like the book's own synopsis.
To sum up, Tony is Dante's alias when he was younger, and Gilver was an alias used by Vergil. **** spoilers, as the book was originally published twelve years ago.
^^ LOL its sounds like some sort of Noir-esque novel
It kinda is.... >_>
And oddly enough DMC anime does hint many things from this Novel
They do. :/ I wonder if they decided it was canon or if they just thought it was good inspiration....
So Dante's in hell what next ?