Dark Prince;153393 said:^Not true, the combat in the first game was good. I like it^_^
In fact, now matter how much you love It, DMC1's gameplay was irritating and clunky.
Dark Prince;153393 said:^Not true, the combat in the first game was good. I like it^_^
Dark Prince;153405 said:^When compared to DMC 3 yes that is true.:lol:
SaaR;152844 said:Good point. As far as the story.. I liked 3 because it filled in some back story which is something the series really benefited from in my opinion. 4 just started something new. It didn't explain any of the questions we've had. Not that I didn't like it. I just wished for some more information to be confirmed, presented, or denied.
darth_angelo45;153570 said:It would have done if Nero was related to Dante, then Nero could have been the "son" that Dante mentions in the first one. The one who inherits Spardas power and defeats Mundus once and for all. Maybe he is who knows, either he is or Capcom have totally lost touch with where they are going with the series. I mean why introduce a new young Dante like character then introduce another one after that?
darth_angelo45;153638 said:Yeah I know thats what I dont get, Dantes son is supposed to make an entrance at some point. Why introduce a new young Dante like character when he isnt related to him.
I am not saying maybe Nero is his son, I am saying maybe Nero is the son like character who inherits the power of Sparda and fulfills the destiny of the Sparda bloodline yada yada yada (even though he isnt a Sparda).