VOLPE
SSStylish Swordsman
Yeah, it would've been a good idea for them to just finish the DMC series first. That way, I doubt there would be much outrage, if any at all. But now Capcom (or at least the Devil May Cry games) has lost a lot of consumers because of their behavior, and even Ninja Theory is seen as a heartless developer by some. I don't think they can be blamed, though - I heard a long time ago that it wasn't their idea to change so much about DMC. Capcom told them it wasn't good, and they had to start over. So they probably had very little time to come up with their own version of Devil May Cry, and it got us a mediocre game as a result.
Besides, you don't reboot something when it's not dead yet, otherwise you get the response - by a large part of the fanbase - that DmC got. DMC4 is seen as a failure by hardcore fans, but it really isn't; have you seen the review scores it got? Aside from that, it sold VERY well, so there's no sense in thinking it ended the DMC series. I could see it as filler, but a failure? Not at all.
not even a filler a new chapter in the series a chance for something new and refreshing should there have been less backtracking ..GODS YES.. should dante have had his own levels..GODS HELL YES.. should nero been a tad less weepy..maybe..and should nero of had his origins explained by the end of the game and have been given a full DT..OH HELL YES YES!!!..but otherwise great graphics..great scenes..great characters and enemies..great plot.. it was a great game the same game that got me to like devil may cry