Angelo Credo;270324 said:
Meh, while I like the series, DMC has a storyline with the depth of a tea-spoon and is about as clichéd as all hell get out, believe me, I've been engaged in enough of the Nero is Vergil's son debates that if I ever seen that comparison crop up again, I might just kill someone.
Primarily because I believe the theory to be the biggest cop-out answer that Capcom could possibly go for and would be the final nail in the "story" of DMC.
But that's a discussion for another thread.
Sooo, has nobody heard of the Divine Comedy? >>;
I mean, other than Dante's Inferno?
The actual BOOK?
Well, if you actually go and at least skim through it, you'll see pretty thickly based similarities between Devil May Cry and it. The first game, moreso than the second or any other for that matter.
Dante's adventure through Hell being guided by Vergil (in this case, Nelo Angelo) and the memory of Beatrice (literally guided by Trish, in this matter). While a bit cliche (in game), I will admit this, and simplified, it was charming and well done. Especially Dante, who originally caught our hearts -- well, if you played them 1 to 4. My bf played 4 first. =.=; Everything, but the action is lost on him.
This is what caught my heart. A wonderful interpretation of a book that had come to be one of my top favourites ever. It wasn't a literal spin-off, not many people see how deep the connection is, and more...modernised. It wasn't so over my little head like the first time reading that book had been.
I miss game one. And
that is what's going to ruin the 5th game for me, just like the other ones did. I still play 3 and 4, and I still enjoy them, but they'll never have the same value as 1 did.
And thus, why I believe LoD is right; nobody's going to be thrilled with it.
I never said I wouldn't be happy with another DMC game; I've been hopeful and played them loyally since the beginning, but you have to have certain expectations. You can't
just be happy with them. How would you Silent Hill fans feel if suddenly it was a first person shooter and the monsters were revealed to just be a genetic experiment gone wrong somewhere in the town, la de la? I know that I would hate Konami so much that I would actually boycott it.
Anyway, because this is getting too long, yes, AC. You can have your opinion, but I see more there than more do for a lot of reasons. (namely, above.) And more specifically on game 1.
Aaaaand, concerning Nero; he shouldn't have even been introduced to begin with. That's been my biggest problem with him to date. I like Nero, he's a good character, there's nothing wrong
with him, but they barely just started on Dante and Vergil and barely dip into anything about Sparda himself. I can see a path where this might all lead down to more about Sparda, but I have the terrifying fear that Capcom won't grasp it and will dig themselves into a worse hole. :/